Movie Review: The Fantastic Four: First Steps

Posted on by • Posted in Action Movie • Leave a comment

The new movie “The Fantastic Four: First Steps” is different and unusual mainly for its proclaimed timeline of “Earth-828,” which is equivalent to the era of the 1960s within a retro-futurian version of New York City. The computer monitors and computers also seem to be from the 1960s, but the technology, especially for space travel, is initially from the current day and later from the future with speed-of-light spaceship technology. This of course, does not make sense. 1960s technology mixed with present-day and future technology?

This film stars Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards • Mister Fantastic (Rubber Man), Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm Invisible Woman, Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm Human Torch and Ebon Moss-Bachrach as Ben Grimm, The Thing. The story involves a huge alien from another planet who wants to destroy the Earth and a silver woman who flies around on a surfboard.

The story has two parts where the Fantastic Four fly to the alien planet, trying to reason with the gigantic alien Galactus, played by Ralph Ineson. It turns out that Galactus with spare the Earth in exchange for the unborn child that is being carried by Storm. When they refuse to give Galactus the child, part 2 is the war on planet Earth between the four superheroes and Galactus. Once again, the special effects are either spectacular or very impressive, but the story is nothing special and definitely nothing new.

Overall, the acting is good from the four main stars and all of the other characters, with some cameos played by Natasha Lyonne and Julia Warner. Based on the money involved and the huge number of past and new movies that are within the Marvel Universe, I was hoping for a better movie, considering that the last two Fantastic movies were 10 and 20 years ago.

The Rotten Tomatoes this time around is a way off 89% with my rating a 75% and a small recommendation.

Movie Review: I Know What You Did Last Summer

Posted on by • Posted in Uncategorized • Tagged , , , • Leave a comment

Far too often, it is hard to believe the movies that are chosen by executives to remake It is often difficult to understand the films chosen by executives for remakes or, in this case, a new sequel to the original “I Know What You Did Last Summer.” (1997). At its best, the original movie was a very stupid, poorly produced slasher movie that grossed only 125 million world wide. Through some demographic calculations and surveys based on the name recognition created from the original movie, the decision was made to try and make more money from the same basic idea about young people on a dangerous road who make a series of mistakes, and a young man dies.

This sequel did not have enough imagination to create a new idea, and once again, five people in their twenties are on the same kind of road overlooking a cliff, with one drunk idiot playing a game of chicken with oncoming cars at night, and once again, someone dies in a car accident. Why not think of something new? Why not have a new evil slasher character that kills people other than, once again, the faceless man in the dark raincoat who guts people with a giant fishhook? We saw this already, 28 years ago. Why do the same thing again?

This time around, there are five new characters in their twenties, Danica Richards played by Madelyn Cline, Ava Brucks played by Chase Sui Wonders – both of whom recently dated Pete Davidson. The other 3 actors involved in the car accident at the start of this movie are mostly unknown. The “hook” idea to save the box office for this bad movie is to bring back three of the main actors of the original 1997 movie, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Freddie Prinze Jr., and a strange, misplaced dream sequence cameo from Sarah Michelle Gellar. The attempt to connect what happened in the first story with this new story failed, along with the absurd ending – an attempt to shock and surprise the audience with the unveiling of the killer. This attempt at shocking surprise turned out to be the worst part of this bad movie because it all made zero sense. The other bad part of the ending was the idiotic reappearance of people who were definitely killed in previous scenes, who for reasons unknown, are still alive despite being killed.

This time around, the critics on Rotten Tomatoes are correct with their very low 38% ratings for this bad slasher movie. I agree with this low rating and do not recommend this film. Hopefully, this is the last movie in this franchise.

Movie Review: Superman

Posted on by • Posted in Action Movie • Tagged , , , • Leave a comment

Due to the hype and the comments on talk shows about the new movie “Superman”, I was surprised at just how bad this movie is. There is no evidence of a coherent sequential story anywhere in these two hours. The characters fly in and out of scenes, with no explanation as to who they are or what they are doing in this badly written screenplay. This is another screenplay that should have had about 5 more re-writes, but this takes too long, and costs the studio money.

In this story, Lois Lane is currently involved with Superman, so there is no mystery about who Clark Kent really is or the ongoing ridiculous “taking eyeglasses off and on” as a major disguise for a superhero. The Superman outfit is nothing new, with tights and red underwear, which, since the beginning of this superhero icon in 1938, one would think would have mutated into a less humiliating outfilt for the actor to wear after so many years.

For this latest Superman film, there are other superheroes, including: Green Lantern, played by Nathan Fillion, Mister Terrific, played by Edi Gathego, Metamorpho, played by Anthony Carrigan, Harkgirl, in a very small part played by Isabela Merced, and The Engineer, played by Maria Gabriela de Faria. Except Green Lantern and Mister Terrific, it is hard to understand why most of the other characters are in this movie, with parts this small.

This movie stars newcomer David Corenswet as Superman, who is well cast and believable as the new Superman and Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane, who is also very good in her role. Unfortunately, the love story between the two is not nearly strong enough, with one exception: an argument during an interview between the two at the beginning of this movie that I thought was well acted. Nicholas Hoult plays the evil Lex Luthor, in a role that I thought was about on a par with Gene Hackman, who played this role in the films that starred Christopher Reeve, starting in 1978.

The rest of this story is all about action scenes, fight scenes, and frequent appearances of an AI dog that jumps on people every time he appears in a scene – not funny enough to save this mostly bad movie. One unique aspect about this new Superman version is how badly and how often Superman is beaten up, which, given the many fans of this superhero and children in the audience, is yet another problem with this film.

Rotten Tomatoes has too high ratings of 82% I can only attribute to favors and payoffs, because this movie is at best 60%, only for some of the insane action scenes. I rate this new Superman movie a disappointing pass, bad enough to potentially hurt the possibility of a sequel.