Netflix Movie Review: Leave the World Behind


The new Netflix movie “Leave the World Behind” has several very impressive visual effects. At the start, there is a huge oil tanker slowly running aground while many people on the beach watch. This looked like they really commissioned a huge tanker and ran it into a beach for real – not computer-generated effects. There is another scene where there is a log jam of driverless Tesla cars all crashing into each other on a highway, due to some kind of ongoing electrical attack from a source that was never fully defined in this story. There is a scene where many deer outside of a log cabin seem to be insane. They are standing in front of a young woman who looks like she is in a trance, and does not move. This is one scene that did look like it was computer generated. This is one of those films where all of the loose ends are never fully resolved and I have never been a fan of a movie like this.

Leave the World Behind stars Julia Roberts as Amanda Sandford and Ethan Hawke as Clay Sandford who are a husband and wife with two children who decide to rent a house for a week. Very shortly after moving in, several strange things start happening, starting with electrical problems in the house, a big New York City blackout and then news of commercial airplanes dropping out of the sky. Very soon after moving in the owner of the house G. H. Scott played by Mahershala Ali and his daughter Ruth, played by Myha’la show up and want to move back into their house because of a blackout in New York City. Understandable conflicts arise from their request to move into the house, mostly between Amanda and G.H.’s very hostile daughter Ruth. Ruth’s rude hostility I thought was way too much considering the extreme circumstances.

Later in the story, Rose, the daughter of Amanda and Clay runs off and cannot be found. Considering the insane circumstances of imminent worldwide doom, this 10 year old girl running off on her own makes very little sense – as does the ending that involves this 10 year old girl and the final episode of the TV series “Friends”. The problem with this movie is that there are way too many loose ends that ruin what started out as an interesting idea for an end of the world story.

I do not understand why the Rotten Tomatoes ratings for this movie are as high as 75%, with my rating about 65% and a pass on this movie – mainly because of the weirdness throughout.

Movie Review: Eileen


Eileen Dunlop, played by Thomasin McKenzie is a 20-something woman who lives in Massachusetts in the 1960s and represents millions of poor and lower middle-class people who because of their parents and where they were born, have minimal options for a happy life. Some people can break free from a life like this, but most are never able to achieve anything better than the cards they were dealt at birth.

The main character of the new movie “Eileen” lives on a depressing rundown street, somewhere in Massachusetts with her father who is a major drunk and her mother who has recently died. Eileen is a secretary and errand runner at a local prison for boys and for good reasons, hates her father. From the beginning, everything about this film is dark and depressing almost as if every scene was shot at night or while it was raining. The first third of this movie is all about Eileen’s depressing life with her retired police officer father and her job, making sitting through the first 30 minutes rather tedious.

There is a term in movie making known as a “fantasy sequence”. This movie has no less than 2 sick fantasy sequences, that are inserted for reasons that could only be to shock the audience. After Eileen is told by the police to hide her father’s gun, there is a sudden, unnecessary, and horrific scene, where she takes the gun, puts it under her chin, and then fires. There is nothing before this horrible scene that could ever be considered a logical set-up. There is another scene where Eileen takes the same gun and stands behind her father and shoots him in the back of the head. Why are these scenes in this movie, other than to perhaps wake up the audience, who by now is sound asleep?

A new story begins with the arrival of a Ph.D. from Harvard, Rebecca played by Anne Hathaway who soon befriends Eileen, and soon after it looks like this friendship could be turning into more.

At the 75% point of this movie, which has at best turned out to be a very boring experience, everything turns into a different, disgusting, and insane new direction when Rebecca calls Eileen to her house for some drinks. For me, this crazy climax, which includes scenes with the mother of one of the boys in the person who was accused of murder is where the entire story falls apart – wrecking any chance of a recommendation, despite the good acting.

Very recently Ann Hathaway appeared on the Jimmy Fallon show to plug Eileen and when it was time for her to talk about this film, all they talked about was one scene where her character makes this primal scream while having drinks with Eileen. There is no mention of the story or any part of this film other than having the Tonight Show audience trying to primal scream like Hathaway in this movie. I thought this was a telltale sign showing how bad and strange this movie is and how it ended. This now makes two low budget art movies that Hathway has appeared in recently, the last one “She Came to Me”, is also extremely strange with a bad story. Its one thing to want to appear in many different types of movies to challenge your skills as an actor, its another thing to actually read the script first.

The insane high ratings on Rotten Tomatoes of 85% make zero sense, because this film has no plausible third act and is too crazy to even be called a movie. My rating is 40% only for some of the acting and a solid pass for this one.

Movie Review: Dream Scenario


The new movie “Dream Scenario” is an extreme example of being a different at-all-costs movie. If the goal was to make a massively different-never-been-done-before film, this one is a 10 out of 10. Unfortunately extremely different is very often not any good and as far as entertainment and quality this movie is only a 3 out of 10. The strange and too often incomprehensible dream sequences and scenes of murder and insanity get very boring and annoying far too quickly.

The entire idea of this story is about a college professor Paul Mathews, played by Nicolas Cage, who throughout this story, finds out that he is becoming part of the dreams of just about everybody he knows. Throughout this movie, Mathew’s dream problem becomes worse and more violent, to the point where Mathew is not allowed to be anywhere around the other people in his town because they are both terrified and hate him. Then towards the end of the movie, there is the revelation about a device that allows people to be part of other people’s dreams. However, this device is not part of the current storyline that represents about 3 quarters of this film. What is the point or even the need of a device like this? Could it be to one day, to produce a weird strange, and rather bad Nicolas Cage movie?

This film is one of those weird try to be different art movies, that the critics find a way to love and the audience mostly hates. The Rotten Tomatoes critics number is 92%, with the audience a low 69%. My rating is 50% and a big time run from this insane mess of two hours, unless you are on high on weed.