Movie Review: The Life of Chuck


The new movie “The Life of Chuck” is based on the Steven King book of the same name. This film successfully creates several new movie ideas that have never been seen before. There are three acts, with the acts told in reverse.

The third act is told as if the entire universe exists with the dying mind of the main character Charles ‘Chuck’ Krantz, played by Tom Hiddleston, and as Chuck slowly dies at age 39, there is an apocalypse that results in the end of the world. This idea is by far the riskiest of the three acts which also includes many billboards througout this act that show Chuck with a caption, “Thank you for 39 great years”.

In the second act, we find out that Chuck is a banker in his adulthood, and at age 39, he is diagnosed with a terminal brain tumor. In another unusual scene, while Chuck is walking to work, he sees a street musician playing the drums, and he starts dancing, eventually being joined by another woman. The dancing was well done, despite its highly unusual presence in this movie.

The first act is about Chuck’s tragic childhood, with Chuck played by Jacob Tremblay. Chuck’s parents are killed in a car accident, and then Chuck goes to live with his grandparents. Chuck learns to dance in high school and demonstrates his unique ability to backwards moonwalk. Actress Mia Sara (one of the main characters in “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” (1986), appears in her first acting role in 14 years. Also highly unusual is a room in the upstairs of the house Chuck lives in that has supernatural abilities that we find out about at the end of this story.

Given that this movie is entirely based on a Steven King short story, there is no workaround as far as making this movie more mainstream and less insane. Overall, this film was well shot and engaging enough to sit through without getting bored. The Rotten Tomatoes ratings of 82% is mostly accurate with my rating around 80% and a solid recommendation.

Apple TV Movie Review: Echo Valley


The new Apple TV movie “Echo Valley” is one of the few movies I have ever seen that explores the lengths a parent will go to protect and save their child. Echo Valley stars Sydney Sweeney as Claire Garretson and Julianne Moore as Kate Garretson in a story where Kate is desperately trying to save the life of Claire, who has fallen into drug use and is associating with dangerous criminals.

There are several well-played scenes of intense, high-emotion acting where Claire is begging Kate for money and lying about her reasons for needing the money, which is obviously to buy more drugs. Kate is divorced, lives on a horse farm, and has big money problems, even asking her ex-husband for money to fix the roof on her barn before it collapses.

The casting of two extreme criminal lowlifes for the parts of Jackie and Claire’s boyfriend Ryan was very well done, as these two actors both played and looked their parts perfectly. There is the standard movie trickery and sleight of hand in this story, which should be considered too outlandish to believe could ever happen. Far too often, it seems to be more important to fool the audience rather than come up with an original and coherent idea. I did like the ending, because it reminded me of one of the reasons we all go to the movies, because real life rarely has a satisfying ending where the evil people get what they deserve.

Due to reviews like this one on Rotten Tomatoes: “Strong performances are squandered on a sub-par script and characters who are too grating to feel a modicum of connection to.”, Dana Han-Klein, the average rating is only 51%. I am giving this film a mild recommendation with a 70% rating only because of the strong acting by both Sydney Sweeney and Julianne Moore.

Movie Review: Materialists


The new movie “Materialists” is about dating through the eyes of people who join expensive dating services, and through the eyes of professional matchmakers, in this case, the main character Lucy, played by Dakota Johnson. It is good to see Dakota Johnson in a very good acting role, and recovering from last year’s disastrous “Madame Web”. Johnson demonstrates in this film some of the best acting of her career.

Of all the difficult professions that exist in the world, being a high-end matchmaker with a fee as high as $50,000 has to be one of the all-time emotional worst. There are several scenes in this movie where a client sits in a restaurant quoting a long list of unrealistic expectations about the person they think they deserve. All of these clients forget that any dating service cannot accept a long list of expectations and then generate the perfect person like it’s an AI-human-being-creator. This is because any dating service, regardless of the cost, is only as good as the people who join. No perfect person exists anywhere in the world for anyone.

As part of this long list of wants and do-not-wants, there is a great deal of talk about how much people earn in salary, as if that is one of the most important requirements for the perfect long-term partner. One of the main messages in this very good movie is the long-term on-and-off-again relationship of Lucy and her very broke waiter, trying to be an actor boyfriend, John, played very well by Chris Evans. The contrast between Lucy’s current rich boyfriend Harry, played by Pedro Pascal, and John, along with Lucy’s eventual decision about them, is one of the best parts of this extremely well-written screenplay.

As several critics have said that screenwriter-director Celine Song paints a very bleak and depressing story about the realities of dating in this world, but most would agree that her point of view is more about the reality of trying to find love, and much less about just being negative about all of the heartache, and depression involved. Dating will always involve putting your heart and soul into the hands of a total stranger, and then trying to accept the consequences when a person you might potentially love does not feel the same way about you.

For me, the actor who steals this entire movie is Sophie, played by Zoe Winters. Her repeated comments about “dying alone” and one scene where the pain in her eyes when she hears that the previous person she went out with did not feel the same way about her are great acting moments in this movie. Later, Sophie’s conversation with Lucy after the latest in a string of 10 bad dates attacked her, included a moment when she breathlessly tells Lucy that she “deserves love”. In my opinion, Winters is worthy of an Academy Award nomination for best supporting actress for these two scenes alone.

The one thing I hated about this movie is the chain-smoking that Lucy does with several other characters. Smoking happens in movies because cigarette companies finance the production despite the downside that includes too many people continuing to smoke or taking it up as a new, stupid hobby. As we all know, smoking causes a long list of Cancers, and showing smoking in movies should have been banned decades ago.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings are a very high 87%, with my rating 95% and a 100% rating for this category of movie, showing what it is like for so many millions of us, who try to find true love in our lifetimes.