Movie Review: Knock at the Cabin


If any aspiring screenwriter, no matter how desperate to break into the movie industry (even if they were connected to some agency) were to submit the script for “Knock at the Cabin”, the reason for the rejections would be the same. “This idea is just too off the wall, too crazy, and does not make sense”.

There is a family of two gay men and one very cute Chinese girl, named Wen, played by Kristen Cui who is about 6 years old. Four people break into their cabin and insist that there is a series of events that are going to end all life on planet earth – unless one of the 3 people in this family agrees to sacrifice themselves to save the world. As this idea drags on, each one of the 4 people who invade the cabin agrees to have themselves killed with an ax after they put a white hood over their heads. What? Why is this necessary that these people who break into the house also must kill themselves? How does having one of the 3 people in the cabin agree to die going to prevent the apocalypse? Can this story give more detail, be more specific? Make some sense?

Apparently, the 4 people who break into the cabin have seen visions of earthquakes, tsunamis, and even airplanes falling out of the sky and now all of this is happening in real-time. But no explanation is given as to how or why human sacrifice is going to prevent the end of the world. How can a glaring hole this big exist in an M. Night Shyamalan movie? There are a series of televised news stories that are shown to the 3 people in the cabin, to prove to them that the end of the world is coming. But why not also explain to them, how exactly might their human sacrifice save the world? What did their premonitions tell them about this most important part of the story?

This movie stars mostly unknown actors with the main character, former pro wrestler Dave Bautista, playing the leader of the group that break into the cabin. I thought the acting was mostly very good by everyone, but the story is so absurd they all must have had a hard time not laughing during their scenes.

Once again M. Night Shyamalan is trying to break new ground, create something different, and achieve that high note he did with “The Sixth Sense”, released in 1999. The Sixth Sense is not only one of the greatest movies of all time but also one of the all-time most perfect endings of any movie ever released. Like the previous Shyamalan film “Old”, released in 2021 – this will be considered another not-so-good film, with Rotten Tomatoes ratings at a below-average 67%, that this time around, I do agree with.

Movie Review: 80 For Brady


In the history of organized team sports in this country, it is impossible to find any athlete who has had more good fortune, great coach, great owner, and downright stunning coaching gifts of 2 super bowl wins (against Seattle and Atlanta) than New England and Tom Brady. For the Seattle and Atlanta wins, New England should have lost both of those games, they won only because of the horrendous coaching of the opposing teams. Brady also won 3 Super Bowls by 3 points each and could have lost any of those games. Brady’s only outright dominant win in Super Bowl #55 was against Kansas City, where the Tampa Bay defense and offensive line injuries made the Kansas City offense impossible to run. Patrick Mahomes was running for his life in almost every play. In this history of the NFL, and 32 teams and many years, no other NFL team has 7 Super Bowl wins like Tom Brady has as a player.

The other day, after changing his mind last year, Tom Brady finally decided to retire from the NFL. One has to wonder about the timing and potential marketing involved for the new movie “80 For Brady”, which not only stars Tom Brady, but at the end of this film, has him talking about his retirement, and considering returning to the NFL yet again. None of this is a coincidence.

80 For Brady is a true story about women in their 80’s who are big fans of Tom Brady and one year (for the New England and Atlanta) super bowl, find a way to get extremely expensive Super Bowl tickets. The problem with this story is that there is not nearly enough story to create a movie about, and because of this, there is too much time to fill. The filling of all of this excess time through jokes, some pratfalls, and too many side stories, makes for a mostly boring movie. This film probably could have been much better but any screenwriter would be hard-pressed to come up with enough new ideas to fill these two hours.

80 For Brady stars Jane Fonda, Lily Tomlin, Sally Field, and Rita Moreno. Their performances and acting were more or less equal to the light concept of this film with the remarkable caveat of Jane Fonda looking more like she is 50 than 85 due to all of that makeup.

Unfortunately, the Rotten Tomatoes critics are right this time around, with a low 62% rating. This is not really a movie, but a travelogue for going to a Super Bowl.

Movie Review: Maybe I Do


While looking at the movie poster and the title for the new film, “Maybe I Do”, I thought that this was going to be a new James L Brooks movie. Unfortunately, this movie is not a James L Brooks film, not even close.

If anyone wonders why James L. Brooks writes and directs a new movie so rarely, it is because he wants every line, every word, and every single scene to be perfect. His best films are “Terms of Endearment”, 1983, “Broadcast News”, 1987, “As Good as it Gets”, 1997, and his last two, not as well received: “Spanglish”, 2004 and “How do you Know”, 2010. My guess is that Brooks was probably discouraged about the bad reviews for How do you Know, after laboring for probably over a year. Since 2010, he has not released a new movie probably because a new screenplay requires so much work, with no guarantee of anything. Screenwriting is in fact, the world’s most challenging art form, even for one of the best screenwriters of all time, James L. Brooks.

As far as Maybe I Do, I think there is a possibility that the producers, knowing that the screenplay was weak, tried to make the movie-going public believe that this movie might be as good as, or kind of like, a James L. Brooks film. Once a movie is released and trashed by Rotten Tomatoes at a 27% rating, then they have to be creative to try and save the box office. This new unique idea will fail like so many others I have seen with other bad movies that have been rated low by Rotten Tomatoes as soon as they are released. Bad dialogue and story are not something you can save using tricks.

The most surprising about this essentially bad movie is the cast is a list of top actors who have been around a long time agreeing to make it. Including Diane Keaton, Richard Gere, William H. Macy, Susan Sarandon and Emma Roberts. Critic Rex Reed captures the reason why actors like these took roles in this film perfectly: “Maybe I Do is another sad example of what happens to seasoned pros when they hang around long enough to end up in material that is regrettably beneath them. They want to work to keep flagging careers alive, but with worthy vehicles, so few and far between, they’re forced to accept whatever lean projects come their way.” Everything about this comment is accurate and the reason why all 4 of these well-known actors, read the script and still agreed to make this film. This kind of thing happens way too often for so many named actors who just want to stay relevant in Hollywood at the risk of making too many bad films.

Fundamentally the problem is that it seems that the screenwriter, Michael Jacobs is trying too hard to make it seem that “this is the way real people talk”. Within minutes of watching this film, I realized that nobody talks like these people. Nobody would ever want to talk like these characters and if anyone talked like them, nobody could stand to be around them. There were times when it was impossible to understand the point they were trying to make, even though there were some ideas about the pain of love, loss, and trying to find love that was well stated. There are some who will find some of this dialogue too preachy, but I thought that some of these moments and on-point comments about one of the most painful parts of being alive, were the only good things about this movie. There was an attempt at a farcical ending – that includes the parents of a young couple trying to decide if they should get married during a group dinner, and their parents who by coincidence already know each other. Most of this fails as do most of the jokes, with the exception of some of the comments from William H Macy.

Perhaps with about 5 more rewrites and collaboration from the best writer of movies like this, James L. Brooks, this screenplay could have been saved, but unfortunately, this one will be in and out of theaters in about 2 weeks. This time around the critical ratings of 27% from Rotten Tomatoes is correct.