Movie Review: Pressure


World War II is the most written about and important event in human history. This war caused the deaths of 74-82 million people (military and civilian) and changed the direction of the world, focusing on preventing a tragedy like this from ever happening again.

Now, 81 years after the end of that horrendous war, a new World War II movie, “Pressure”, has been released about the decisions regarding weather for the Normandy Invasion, which occurred on June 6, 1945. The Normandy Invasion is the largest military invasion in human history, including 326,000 troops, 5000 ships, and 13,000 aircraft. Without this invasion’s success 81 years ago, the Allies would not have won the war, or it would have taken more years and many more lives.

General Dwight Eisenhower, played very well by Brendan Fraser, had the weight of the entire world on his shoulders when he was put in charge of a huge logistical nightmare of an enormous invasion in the hope of ending the worst war in history. One of the most important decisions was to decide when to invade, based on favorable weather conditions. Eisenhower hired Meteorologist James Stagg (Andrew Scott) to use the comparatively low-level science of the time, which included no satellites and computers, while using surface weather stations, weather balloons, radar, air mass (front) theory, and mathematical forecasting.

The current Meteorologist on Eisenhower’s staff, Irving Krick, (Chris Messina), was using weather patterns from years or decades ago to try to predict weather that was going to happen in a few days, while Stagg believed in a much more scientific approach that was by far more accurate. The huge arguments between Krick and Stagg are some of the best parts of this movie. The story of this film made it amazing to realize that the success of the most important invasion in history and the lives of 326,000 men was the result of the scientific genius of James Stagg and his refusal to tell Eisenhower and his staff, “what they wanted to hear” about invading on June 5th. More importantly, there was the miracle last-minute discovery of a small window of time that made an invasion on June 6 possible, despite the arrival of two major storms. This discovery was only plausible because of the final agreement and collaboration between Stagg and Krick.

Much like the movie “Hidden Figures”, released in 2016, this movie reveals to the world a person we all should have known about for decades. Without the genius of Katherine Johnson, NASA would have never made it into space, and without the genius of James Stagg, the world might have never been able to defeat Germany in World War II.

The Rotten Tomatoes rating for this movie of 85% is night high enough for such an important movie about World War II. My rating is 95%, and a very strong recommendation to see this outstanding film.

Amazon Prime Movie Review: Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan: Ghost War


The latest installment of the Jack Ryan movie series on Amazon Prime, this time around, is a two-hour movie, not a series. It is a great example of producers trying to “squeeze as much money out of the rock” for a well-known name and franchise that I have ever seen.

The character of Jack Ryan started in 1990, starring Alec Baldwin in “The Hunt for Red October”, and spawned two very good movies movies, “Patriot Games” (1992) and “Clear and Present Danger (1994) starring Harrison Ford, “The Sum of All Fears” (2002) starring Ben Affleck, “Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit” (2014) and the current one, streaming now on Amazon Prime, “Jack Ryan Ghost War” (2026) starring John Krasinski. Krasinski also starred in 4 seasons of Jack Ryan in Prime in 2018, 2019, 2022, 2023.

This story grabs all that works in the previous Jack Ryan series, starting with the long-time close friendship between Jack Ryan, played by Krasinski, and James Greer, played by Wendell Pierce, where there are scenes of their affection and respect for one another and intense arguments, due to new revelations about cases they have worked on in the past. There are well-done scenes of massive gunfire, car chases, and shootouts inside buildings and cars blowing up. This movie also stars Sienna Miller, who plays an MI6 agent Emma Marlow, and Max Beesley as Liam Crown, who is the evil leader of a criminal organization.

The problem is that there is nothing new in this movie; we have seen it all before in the four Prime series and the previous five movies. In the rush to make more money in the Jack Ryan series, the realization was that name recognition would probably mean that less time would be necessary to write an interesting and innovative screenplay. People will probably want to stream this new movie because of the name “Jack Ryan”; there’s no need to take 18 months to write and then re-write a new screenplay. Let’s make money now.

This unfortunate, slap-together story and then rushing to production is the number one reason why this movie is getting such low marks on Rotten Tomatoes of 45%. I agree with this rating and do not recommend this movie. You are better off watching the older movies or the early Jack Ryan series.

Movie Review: In the Grey


The new movie “In the Grey” is one of those rare, below-average January movies that are released in May. This film is another example of several well-known stars agreeing to appear in a bad movie due to a favor, contract, or previous verbal agreement, forcing them to act in a movie with a bad screenplay. This film was both written and directed by Guy Ritchie, and I was surprised by how low-quality this movie is, considering the huge experience Guy Ritchie has as both a screenwriter and director. afsgasdfa

The Grey has five well-known bankable actors, including Henry Cavill, Jake Gyllenhaal, Fisher Stevens, Eiza González, and Rosamund Pike. It is possible that the screenplay below average was on hold for a long time, with money already committed to its production. Then a decision was made to hire these five well-known actors to try to save the box office. Due to the very low 47% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, saving the box office for this movie is highly unlikely.

Eiza Gonzalez plays Rachel, who is an independent operative who is hired to coerce huge debts from very wealthy criminals around the world. She works with mercenaries, played by Gyllenhaal and Cavill, with much of this story explaining how they will try to force a wealthy drug dealer Manny Salazar, played by Carlos Bardem, to pay them 1 billion dollars. The story is erratic, too disconnected, and too convoluted to recommend as an action or drama movie. The acting is just OK, with action scenes that are nothing we have not seen many times before.

I agree with the low 47% Rotten Tomatoes rating and recommend this B-movie for right-to-DVD.