Movie Review: Ella McCay


James L. Brooks is arguably one of the greatest screenwriters of all time. Starting with “Terms of Endearment” (1983) and followed by “Broadcast News” (1987) and then with “As Good as it Gets” (1997) his movies – the combination of great comedy and drama, have set a standard of excellence that have made films like these in a category all on their own, a “James L. Brooks type” movie. Due to Brook’s dedication and hard work, it takes years to write a new screenplay, painstakingly rewriting and improving it over time.

Unfortunately, there is no better example of how difficult it is to write a great screenplay than the career of James L. Brooks. With his huge high high-quality hits ending in 1997, there was a glitch in 1994 with “I’ll Do Anything”, and starting in 2004, with the below-average “Spanglish”, his screenplays ever since the outstanding As Good as it Gets, have declined, ending with the bad new movie “Ella McCay”. One would think that, waiting 15 years since “How Do You Know,” this new movie would have returned to the quality that Brooks achieved with As Good as it Gets.

The critics are at their worst with their reviews of this film. Joshua Mbonu: “With constant misses in the film’s attempts at comedy and performances that are as absent as the film itself, Ella McCay, at the very least, sticks out as one of the more baffling films you’ll watch unfold this year.” Brian Orndorf: “Sadly, brightness of spirit is buried in a mess of a movie, watching Brooks build a maze of characters and motivations he ultimately can’t find his way out of.” Jim Schembri: “A surprisingly spiritless and flustered stumblebum of a comedy.” Marshall Shaffer: “But the screenplay is an otherwise calamitous creation that demonstrates more than just a lack of Brooks’ previous genius. It stands in complete disregard for the most basic principles of screenwriting.” For someone as talented as Brooks, now 88 years old, to see reviews this bad at this late stage in his career has to hurt. This is the life of anyone in Hollywood who places years of work in front of the eyes of critics, who at times can be overly cruel.

The most hard to understand aspect of this film is why there were no checks and balances, and numerous eyes from other directors, producers, and screenwriters who said to Brooks, “This needs about 10 more rewrites.” There is nothing wrong with writing a bad screenplay; the problem is when you have so much fame, money, and clout that you can put out a bad movie like this one, without making sure that it is actually good enough to release.

Ella McCay stars Emma Mackey as Ella McCay, Woody Harrelson as Ella’s father, Eddie McCay, who is a serial cheater, Rebecca Hall as Ella’s mother, Jamie Lee Curtis as Ella’s aunt Hellen, and Spike Fearn as Ella’s younger brother, Casey. Kumail Nanjiani has a strange part as a State Trooper in a role that makes very little sense, with very few lines. Ayo Edebiri has a small part in this movie as the former girlfriend of Casey, with scenes that seem to be nothing more than making the running time over two hours. Julie Kavner has an acting/narration role that also makes very little sense, because there seems to be no reason for this movie to have any narration. Albert Brooks is also in this movie as the Governor of an unknown State, and once he decides to take a cabinet position, Ella takes over as the Governor, in her early 30s. Of course, none of this makes any sense. Given that Ella is so young as Lieutenant Governor, it is unlikely that a Governor of a State would leave his job under these conditions. There is a scene at the end of this movie with Ella and her aunt Helen standing and screaming out their frustrations to each other, which gives an ironic twist, because this is exactly what any fan of James L. Brooks wants to do after sitting through this waste of two hours.

This movie is a series of mostly disconnected stories that try to be funny or interesting, but when thrown together, do not seem to have any direct point or overall message. The plot is very difficult to fully describe because there is no definable plot that you would expect within a major movie release.

In terms of the actors and the great screenwriter involved, this huge miss is one of the biggest surprises I have seen since last year’s complete disaster “Megalopolis”, which redefined the definition of what a bad movie is. The Rotten Tomatoes ratings of 20% for this amazingly bad film are correct. This one should be missed at all costs.

The Grid below is a list of all the great, average, and bad James L. Brooks movies since his massive hit in 1983 with Terms of Endearment, which won for best picture, best director, best actress Shirley Maclaine, Jack Nicholson for best supporting actor, and best adapted screenplay.

YearFilmRT TomatometerOscar NominationsOscar Wins
1983Terms of Endearment81%115
1987Broadcast News98%70
1994I’ll Do Anything65%00
1997As Good as It Gets86%72
2004Spanglish54%00
2010How Do You Know31%00
2025Ella McCay20%00

Amazon Prime Movie Review: Oh. What. Fun.


The new streaming movie on Amazon Prime Video, “Oh. What. Fun.”, is a comedy about the holidays and the challenges a mother, Claire, played by Michelle Pfeiffer, faces every year to get everything ready for Christmas, along with her husband Nick, played by Denis Leary. There is the arrival of her three children, Sammy played by Dominic Sessa, Channing played by Felicity Jones, and Taylor played by Chloë Grace Moretz. An ongoing competition with her neighbor Jeanne, played by Jeanne Wang-Wasserman, over who has the best decorations both inside and especially the outside of their houses. Some scenes of this ongoing competition are funny, mainly the interactions between Claire and Jeanne as they try to top each other with decorations and Christmas gifts. One scene with Claire defying Jeanne’s request to not have giant Christmas balloons on her lawn this year was one of the better parts of this film.

The rest of this story has to do with Claire’s three children and their respective relationship problems. Taylor is a lesbian and has a major misunderstanding with her girlfriend, resulting in their breakup during their visit. Sammy was dumped by his wife, mainly over his lack of desire to ever find a job, and Channing and her husband Doug, played by Jason Schwartzman, are having ongoing marital problems during their Christmas visit.

One of the most impressive things about this above-average comedy is the long list of relevant and successful actors, most of them in relatively small parts, compared to their previous movie roles, proving again how difficult it is to get a great role and stay relevant in Hollywood. Felicity Jones hit some huge high points in her acting career with “On the Basis of Sex” (2018), and last year’s (way too long) “The Brutalist”. For Michelle Pfeiffer, this movie is one of her first leading roles in many years.

There is a “Home Alone” moment when the family was scheduled to see a local performance amnd Nick and his daughter Channing think that the other person is taking Claire in their car, and she is left behind, setting the stage for a long road trip when Claire out of anger and disgust just drives from Atlanta Georgia and winds up in Burbank California on the set of a daytime TV show, hosted by a woman named Zazzy Tims, played by Eva Longoria. This last part of this story, for the most part, does not work, and seems more like a gimmick than a logical end to a Christmas comedy movie like this.

The very low 35% ratings on Rotten Tomatoes are justified as this film misses the mark in too many areas, starting with the obvious, it’s just not funny enough. One of the harshest reviews is from Peter Travers: “Oh, What. Crap. This lump of coal in our holiday stocking entraps Michelle Pfeiffer and is flat, stilted, lazy and so stretched out with Xmas clichés that you want to scream, bah-humbug.” While I think that this is too harsh a review, unfortunately, there are too many reviews that are this negative. No comedy that is not funny enough can be recommended, so I rate this movie a solid pass.

Movie Review: Now You See Me: Now You Don’t


The new movie “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” is the third and hopefully last in this movie franchise, the first two: Now You See Me (2013) and Now You See Me 2 (2016). In order to be relevant in Hollywood and make enough money to survive in California, one of the most expensive areas in the world, an actor has to keep making movies and money in order to afford the costs of living in a state where almost all of the movies are made. So making money over quality is a reality of life as an actor in Hollywood to much of the time.

Unfortunately great stories and screenplays are few and far between and this third installment was written and greenlighted only to make money and not to put out a quality film. The plot makes almost no sense, and just jumps from one unexplained scene to another one for two hours entirely for the purpose of showing some magic and misdirection, most of which is either impossible or ridiculous. The reason why screenwriting is so difficult is that the story has to make sense, action and scenes have to be explained and predefined, along with continuity throughout the entire story. This film has none of these essential ingredients.

The original cast returns in this movie, Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Mark Ruffalo, Isla Fisher, Dave Franco and Morgan Freeman. For this third film, new cast members have been added, which will probably mean there is a long term plan to extend this nightmare into new movies. The new cast includes Ariana Greenblatt, Dominic Sessa and Henry Fisher as they all try to stop a criminal mastermind Veronika Vanderberg played by Rosamund Pike from using Diamonds to launder money for other master criminals. On top of this being an overall bad movie, it is slow and very boring in too many areas, making the audience hope that it will all be over soon.

The Rotten Tomatoes rating is a too high 60%, with my rating around 20%, hoping that this will be end to a pretty stupid series of movies trying to be about magicians solving crimes.