Movie Review: Twisters


The summer blockbuster hit “Twister” was released in May 1996 and had some of the best tornado special effects ever filmed. For many fans of the first film, the new remake “Twisters” will not disappoint as far as the special effects which are as good and in some areas better than the original. I was surprised that while the special effects in this new movie were impressive, considering the advances in technology in the last 28 years I was expecting more spectacular action scenes.

With the increasing number and severity of global warming, this new Twister remake has been expected. This time around, this new film has more science as far as ideas on how to stop a tornado once it starts. Once again “Dorothy”, the flying plastic balls that when released into the funnel cloud send signals that give scientists an idea of how a tornado forms, to better understand these increasingly devastating weather disasters from happening are a minor part of this new film. There was a good amount of science in this story, which is why storm chasers risk their lives chasing these dangerous violent weather phenomena.

While this new movie is a remake of the original it is significantly different enough as far as the story and what happens as well as the characters with two scientists Kate, played by Daisy Edgar-Jones, and Tyler played by Glen Powell who are mostly at odds, and then become more than friends later in this story.

There is significantly more death in this remake, especially at the beginning of this movie, where Kate experiences the deaths of several of her friends. Realizing that there are real storm chasers who devote their lives to trying to solve the most dangerous weather conditions in the world, you have to admire the courage it would take to do drive an SUV into a tornado to make a living. The idea this movie proposes to insert chemicals into an active tornado to stop it might be a viable idea in the future, using electric drone SUVS, assuming that such chemicals could ever be created.

The Rotten Tomatoes rating for this film of 77% is accurate and I give it a solid recommendation mainly for the special effects.


Movie Review: Longlegs


For the new horror movie “LongLegs” the one standout is the perfect environment for a movie like this. Dark depressing town, every house has dark walls, always either raining or about to rain.

The character Longlegs is played by a completely unrecognizable Nicolas Cage, who must have had hours of makeup every day to get him to look like this horrific mass-murdering character.

The depressing reality of the life of an FBI agent who has to investigate horrendous murder scenes, see autopsy pictures, and deal with mass murderers like the one represented in this film. After seeing this movie, it makes you wonder why anyone would want to be an FBI agent with a job like the ones depicted in this story.

The main character and FBI agent is Agent Lee Harker, played by Maika Monroe. Monroe does a good job at playing a shy, slightly autistic, genius crime investigator with her boss Agent Carter played by Blair Underwood in one of his first movie roles in a long time. The entire story is weird, involving devil worship and a series of hand-made life-size girl dolls that lead to a convoluted and insane ending that does not make enough sense to provide a satisfying conclusion.

The Rotten Tomatoes critics rating of 87% is too high, with a more correct 65% audience rating that I agree with. This movie is a pass, despite seeing Nicolas Cage in the most insane makeup I have ever seen.

Movie Review: Fly Me to the Moon


On July 20, 1969, after 10 years of effort and the work of over 400 thousand workers from numerous external vendors who assembled and tested thousands of parts in one of the most dangerous and ambitious missions in human history, NASA (The National Aeronautics and Space Administration) landed two men on the moon.

Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were the first two men on the moon for Apollo 11. After Apollo 11 five more successful missions to the moon happened, ending with Apollo 17 on December 7, 1972. The one failure, Apollo 13 on April 11, 1970, did not make it to the moon due to an explosion, that turned out to be one of NASA’s finest moments when they saved the lives of three Astronauts and brought them home despite impossible odds, the subject of Ron Howard’s great film, “Apollo 13” (1995).

Since the last moon landing in 1972, five movies have been released suggesting that the moon landings were all faked. “Capricorn One” (1978), “Astronauts Gone Wild” (2004), “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” (2001), “Dark Side of the Moon” (2002), “Room 237” (2012). The last movie, Room 237 was a documentary about Stanley Kubrick’s “The Shining” (1980) that had clues about Kubrick’s involvement in possibly faking the moon landings.

Considering the ongoing conspiracy theories documentaries and movies that still proclaim that the NASA moon landings were faked, it makes no sense that now after over 50 years NASA has not come up with a huge marketing campaign that includes two-hour documentaries, segments on 60 minutes, books, magazines that finally put to rest forever, these constant lies about the moon landings being faked.

Rather than an aggressive marketing campaign putting all of the conspiracy theories to rest, NASA policy through the years has been “Overall, NASA provides ample evidence and relies on the scientific community to support the reality of the moon landings, focusing its efforts on continuing space exploration and scientific discovery.” However, taking the high road for over 50 years has not killed the ongoing lies about the moon landings. The new movie “Fly Me to the Moon” is yet another film that includes a storyline about Apollo 11 being faked by a Hollywood producer and director.

Fly Me to the Moon stars Scarlett Johansson as Kelly Jones, an advertising executive hired by NASA to promote the space agency and raise money for the space program by linking the agency to as many products as possible. Channing Tatum plays Cole Davis a NASA mission administrator who is in constant conflict with Kelly Jones as she tries to market NASA to make money for the space program. The original idea of this film is at first very good, with some good drama and comedy as ongoing problems and arguments between the two main characters carry this story. During the last 1/3 of this movie, Moe Berkus, a government official working directly with the White House, played by Woody Harrelson comes up with an idea to have a fail-safe video feed that NASA will show the world, in case something goes wrong if/when the Astronauts land on the moon. The good part of this is that this movie does not proclaim that the moon landing was faked, only that the attempt to fake it did exist to save NASA from potential embarrassment. What follows is what comes off as mostly a comedic parody ending that saves this story from being just another conspiracy theory movie and in some ways tries to make fun of the 50+ year “the moon landings were faked” conspiracy theories.

As far as the movie, that acting was good, some of the comedy did work, some other parts did not. The Rotten Tomatoes rating of only 67% is too low, with my rating a solid 75% and a recommendation because this film is entertaining enough to recommend.