Movie Review: The Smashing Machine


The new movie “The Smashing Machine” is a true story about a former Mixed Martial Arts champion Mark Kerr (Dwayne Johnson) . This film is essentially comprised of 3 main parts. The first part is about the ridiculous sport of MMA (Mixed Martial Arts), which has no real rules and comes down to two men falling to the floor on each other and beating each other in the head or the face using their hands or, in this movie, frequently using their knees to knock a man unconscious. While this “hitting the man in the head with your knee” method was considered a rules violation, it was still allowed in several fights during this story, because in this sport, there are no rules, other than perhaps eye gouging.

The second part of this story is about the relationship and constant arguing of Mark Kerr and Dawn Staples (Emily Blunt). During almost the entire time on screen, Dawn and Mark would drift from one insane argument after another. Too many times, these non-stop arguments were over nothing. One time, they even argued over a cactus plant. While these intense arguments did show acting ability from both Johnson and Blunt, seeing so many of them got old halfway through these two hours.

The third part of this story is about Mark Kerr’s constant abuse of pain killers, which included dangerous opioids that almost took his life and led him to rehab. The worst part of a story like this is how depressing it is that any human being would choose to be devoted to a sport that is so idiotic, and should have been outlawed years ago. Why is it considered entertaining to see two men fall to the floor and hit each other in the face and head?

There has been some buzz about the impressive acting of Dwayne Johnson in this movie and there are indeed some scenes that do show that he can act. Even though this movie is average at best, I believe Johnson will be nominated for a Golden Globe award and possibly even an Oscar, but the quality of this movie will probably prohibit him from winning either award.

I agree with the moderate 73% ratings for this movie on Rotten Tomatoes, but due to the ridiculous fighting scenes of a sport that should be banned, I do not recommend this film.

Movie Review: One Battle After Another


The new movie “One Battle After Another” has one aspect of movie-making taken from Christopher Nolan, the almost non-stop background music throughout the entire film. Why would any movie director desire non-stop background music? For me, the annoying music distracts too much from the story. Perhaps the director Paul Thomas Anderson’s mentor is director Christopher Nolan, who had background music playing througout last year’s Oppenheimer. I will never be a fan of background music during any movie.

One Battle After Another is about a group of militant criminals who rob banks to fund their cause called “The French 75,” which is a revolutionary group that resists government surveillance and corporate corruption. From the beginning of this story, you realize it is going to be one of those “desperate to be different” movies, when you find out that one of the main characters, played by Sean Penn, is named “Col. Steve J. Lockjaw”, easily one of the craziest character names in the history of movies.

Everything about this movie tries to be new and different and, in too many scenes, insane. This movie stars Leonardo DiCaprio as Bob, one of the leaders of French 75. He is married to Perfidia (Teyana Taylor), who is the character most involved with the bank robberies that fund the group. In one scene, extremely pregnant with her stomach exposed, Perfidia fires off many rounds of a machine gun in an open field – yet another crazy moment in this film.

When Perfidia is captured, the insane Colonel Lockjaw falls in love with her and allows her to escape into witness protection. Perfidia eventually flees to Mexico, and her character is never seen again in this story. We find out later that Bob’s daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), is Lockjaw’s daughter, setting the stage for her kidnapping by Colonel Lockjaw later in the film.

The conclusion is equally as crazy as the rest of this movie, with a highly unusual car chase scene on a remote highway.

The acting is very good throughout this film; however, the too high 96% rating on Rotten Tomatoes I do not agree with, with my rating 85% and a recommendation. I agree mostly with the review of Christopher Lloyd (The Film Yap) that summarizes this movie better than any other review: “An overly long, messy, tonally weird piece that inartfully stitches together disparate elements. Some great performances, including Sean Penn, but he’s a cartoon villain. The women — Chase Infiniti, Teyana Taylor and Regina Hall — really drive it.”

The bottom line is, for any movie, just because it is a new idea and has never been seen before does not automatically make it good or enjoyable to the audience.

Movie Review: Eleanor the Great


The movie “Eleanor the Great” is a simple and small movie marking the directorial debut of Scarlett Johansson. Eleanor is played by 95-year-old June Squibb (she turns 96 in November 2025), who once again has a very funny and likable presence in this film.

The story is about Eleanor living in Florida with a long-term friend Bessie (Rita Zohar), who for years tells Eleanor about the experiences of her brother and family during the Holocaust. When Bessie dies, Eleanor decides to move to New York City to be with her daughter Lisa (Jessica Hecht) and grandson Max (Will Price). During a Holocaust group therapy session, Eleanor tells some of these Holocaust stories she heard from her friend, unfortunately, not making it clear that these were not her experiences.

Eleanor then becomes friends with a young college student, Nina (Erin Kellyman), who wants to write about her Holocaust experiences. Nina later involves her father, Roger (Chiwetel Ejiofor), who has a TV show, in this project. This story which started very simply, soon becomes complicated with Eleanor getting into trouble with Nina and her father for lying, even though the whole fiasco was a simple misunderstanding.

This story was very well told, along with excellent acting throughout. This movie received a low 66% rating due to its simple story, but in my opinion, the simplicity is the best part of this screenplay, with my rating 80% and a recommendation.