Movie Review: The Beekeeper


In terms of well-done revenge movies, with a great opening idea, the new Jason Statham movie “The Beekeeper” is one of the best films of its kind I have ever seen and clearly the best action movie that Statham has ever starred with the lead role.

What draws you in, is the start of this movie, where an older woman Eloise Parker, played very well by Phylicia Rashad is at her laptop and like so many millions of us have seen, she receives a message on her screen that says, “call this number, your computer’s hard drive may be corrupted”. For those of us who have no real computer experience, calling the phone number is a natural thing that too many people would do, out of fear of losing important data on their computer. The other reason why so many call the number is that decent human beings can sometimes have a very hard time understanding just how disgusting the lowlife in this world can be. Who are these animals who prey on old people, try to scam, trick, and ultimately steal billions of dollars every year from so many good human beings. Life savings are stolen, representing years or decades of hard work. Too many victims commit suicide, realizing that their entire lives have been destroyed by the worst kind of criminal.

Adam Clay, played very well by Jason Statham is the neighbor and close friend of Eloise Parker, and once he finds out what happened to her, he embarks on a vendetta to destroy the entire organization that exists to collect data to find the right victims and steal money from millions of people, using technology and the internet. It turns out that Clay’s profession as a beekeeper was also his code name in a covert part of the CIA that gave Clay the highest level of Karate and hand-to-hand combat skills. What follows are the expected over-the-top and standard Statham Karate scenes, this time more violent and insane than some of Stathan’s previous movies. The ability of Adam Clay to kill so many, mostly FBI agents, and not be injured and killed himself is as crazy and implausible as any of the 4 John Wick movies. Regardless, the action scenes are as well done and impressive as I have seen in any Statham movie.

This film also stars Minnie Driver who plays Director Janet Harward of the FBI, in a surprisingly small role. Jeremy Irons plays Wallace Westwyld the CEO of a parent company that supports the many warehouses of criminals that spend all day preying on thousands of victims. I was surprised to see Irons in this movie because even though this movie is good, it is normally below the higher quality films that Irons has made in the past.

The only objection I had with this story is that the number of FBI agents that Adam Clay killed, seemed way out of proportion, considering that he was trying to wipe out a company comprised of the worst kind of criminals and the FBI agents were only trying to do their jobs.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings are once again wrong at 69%, with my rating a solid 85% for a very well-done action/revenge movie.

Movie Review: House of Gucci


While watching this too long 2 hour and 37 minute movie – I kept thinking about better titles other than “House of Gucci”. How about “House of Chain Smokers”, “House Full of Matches”, “How To Get Lung Cancer”. In all my years of going to the movies as a hobby, I have never seen more smoking in a film than this one. Not even close. Either a character was constantly smoking, or lighting up a cigarette, or grabbing for a cigarette – non stop in about 95% of every scene. My only explanation is that the producers realized that getting funding for this soap opera about the Gucci family was going to be difficult – mainly because the script was not any good. So, they lobbied every cigarette company in the world and begged them to send them money, promising non stop smoking in almost every scene in return. Smoking can kill you, in about 100 different ways, so why is the movie industry allowing this level of money over not promoting a huge human health hazard?

What is most hard to understand about this mostly bad movie is how they got Al Pacino, Lady Gaga, Jared Leto (unrecognizable in his role Paolo Gucci – with some pretty bad acting), Jeremy Irons and Adam Driver to agree to make this film, after they read the script? Then add the extremely respected Ridley Scott who directed this film. This story also commits the ultimate cardinal sin – its way too boring to keep anyone’s attention for any length of time. There are good signs that Lady Gaga can be a very good actress and some of her scenes with Adam Driver were good – but unfortunately the screenplay is just not good enough for anyone to care about the acting.

As far as I could tell, the only message within this story is that even if you are super rich and super lucky, you will still have problems. Just problems of a different proportion and different level of importance. One of the problems of being rich is that other people will be gunning for you – trying to your steal money in so many different ways. Being rich and famous can involve constantly looking over your shoulder to see who is coming around the corner.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for House of Gucci is a very low 61% for many reasons. I agree with this rating and do not recommend this film.