Movie Review: Nuremburg


The atrocities of World War II, perpetrated on humanity, are some of the worst in the entire history of the world. The millions of murders, mostly of Jews in Europe, were so extreme that once the war ended, all governments in the world realized that something had to be done to punish the Nazi animals responsible, if for no other reason, to try and prevent something like this from ever happening again. The problem was that the world had never put war criminals on trial, with the United States, Russia, England, and Ireland all interested in bringing this group of Nazi war criminals to justice.

Then the problem became hiring a psychologist, Major Douglas M. Kelley, to determine whether these Nazi war criminals were mentally fit to stand trial, which is the major part of the new movie “Nuremberg”, starring Russell Crowe as Hermann Göring and Rami Malek as Douglas Kelly. The many conversation scenes between Crowe and Malik in this movie were very well acted, with Crowe giving one of his best acting performances in decades.

The lead prosecutor for the Nuremberg trial, Robert H. Jackson, played very well by Michael Shannon, provides some of the best scenes in this film, as he interviews Göring, with the help of the prosecutor from England, getting Göringto admit that after he testified that he knew nothing about the mass murders, that given what he knows now, he still would not go against Adolf Hitler.

The aftermath of the trial included the righteous hanging of all the Nazi War criminals, with Göring committing suicide with a long-hidden cyanide capsule, minutes before he was scheduled to be hanged. The life of Douglass Kelly took a very negative turn for years after the Nuremberg trials, where he suffered from extreme depression and took his own life in 1958.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for this film are way too low 72%, as this movie was also snubbed for Golden Globe nominations, where Crowe, Malik, and Shannon all should have been nominated for best actor awards. None of this makes any sense for a movie about an extremely important part of world history and such standout acting. My rating is an 85% and a solid recommendation to see this well-acted and important movie.

Movie Review: Gladiator II


The peak of actor Russel Crowes’ career was in 2000 and 2001 when he starred in the first “Gladiator” movie and won the Best Actor Oscar and was then nominated the following year (and should have won) for playing the brilliant Nobel Prize-winning professor John Nash in “A Beautiful Mind,” directed by Ron Howard. Unfortunately for Crowe, after some bad breaks and the ongoing harsh realities of the movie industry, getting a top movie role, finding a good enough screenplay, and trying to survive the fickleness of the American public, Russel Crowe has never reached the heights of 2000 and 2001 again.

The sequel to Gladiator, “Gladiator II,” is another story that spends much time creating excuses for major fight scenes and violent death inside the Roman Colosseum, and not much time for character development and interesting dialogue. For me with both films, the historical content of showing thousands of human beings sitting in a huge stadium while smiling and laughing at the agony and horrific death of slaves and soldiers is one of history’s greatest examples of “man’s inhumanity to man”. This sequel does have scenes of Crowe as Maxiumus from the original movie, with a timeline some 20 years later with Maxiumus’s son, Lucius played very well by actor Paul Mescal and Maxiumus’s wife Lucilla played once again by Connie Nielsen.

In this sequel, there are no Tigers that rush into the Colosseum to kill people, instead, the director
Ridley Scott, who directed the first Gladiator, has vicious monkeys, a huge charging rhinoceros ridden by a Roman Soldier, and even an ocean-water-filled Colosseum floor with man-eating sharks who attack and kill men who fall off the boats while fighting with swords and bow and arrows. This part of the story, with Sharks, Monkeys, and a huge Rhinocerous has more to do with Hollywood embellishment than being true to Roman history.

Denzel Washington plays Macrinus, the central antagonist in this story who is constantly scheming to take over as emperor of Rome does provide some of the best acting in this film, a main reason to see this sequel despite the obvious drop in quality from the first movie. As with the last film, the fighting is extremely violent, brutal and definitely not for children younger than 15.

The critics are not very high on this movie, giving an anemic 72% rating, and this time around I agree with the critics as this movie is too much about nonstop fighting scenes, with not much else. Due to the impressive special effects, I give Gladiator II a small recommendation.

Movie Review: The Pope’s Exorcist


In 1973, 50 years ago, the movie “The Exorcist” was released in theaters. Ever since this one-of-a-kind, game-changing film was released (causing moviegoers to run away and actually faint in the theaters), there have been so many Exorcist films trying to take advantage of the exceptional quality and name recognition of the original film. All of these movies have failed to capture the true horror created by the original. There will be a sequel to “The Exorcist” released in October 2023 and only because the author of the book William Peter Blaty co-wrote the screenplay and Ellen Burstyn will reprise her original role as Chris MacNeil – there is some hope that this new Exorcist just might be worthy of the original.

As far as this new movie “The Pope’s Exorcist” the only thing scary about this film, once again about demon possession, is to witness how far the acting career of Russel Crowe has fallen, since its peak in 2000 when he won the Oscar for “Gladiator” and should have won the Oscar in 2002 for “A Beautiful Mind”. During the filming of A Beautiful Mind with Ron Howard in 2001, there was news that Crowe was difficult to work with. Possibly this is the reason why he is never been close to getting great roles like these ever again. This new movie is nothing more than a bad B movie, about the same thing – trying to make money from a great film that was released 50 years ago.

The young Spanish boy who was possessed in this movie looked more like a puppet than a human being. The makeup was bad as was the entire story, which meandered all over the place and included a bad ending.

Why or how could Russel Crowe read this poor script and agree to make this film is a mystery, even despite the downturn in his acting career. This is one movie that will be out of the theaters in a little over a week from now.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for The Pope’s Exorcist are too high 49% with my rating at only 20% and a big miss. Wait for the new exorcist sequel to come out in October and miss this bad film.