Movie Review: Arthur the King


For any aspiring screenwriter or movie producer, submitting the script for the new movie “Arthur the King” would most likely be rejected because the story of one exceptional dog following a group of 4 endurance racers through a huge forest and mountains would be considered too unbelievable. For this story to be greenlighted as a major movie, it would have to be a true story, which it is. However this film does not begin with the standard, “this is a true story” message at the start of the movie, you have to wait until the end to realize that this incredible series of events actually did happen.

This story follows the career of an Ironman athlete Mikael Lindnord, played by Mark Wahlberg, who assembles a group of friends and endurance racers to participate in the world’s most difficult endurance race, the “Adventure Racing World Championships”. This race includes running, hiking, climbing, biking, and kayaking through the most difficult terrain in the Dominican Republic. I remember thinking while watching this film, why anyone would ever want to risk their lives for a sporting event like this that requires a team of 4 extreme athletes to trek through 435 miles of mountains and jungle in 10 days.

To participate in this race, Lindnord has to get corporate sponsorship and assemble a group of 3 other athletes, finally accepting only 50 thousand dollars to risk the lives of 4 people. I wondered how any person could make a living in a sport like this, with so little money involved with so much danger.

The majority of the movie is about the preparation for the race and establishing the relationships between the other 3 participants, played by Nathalie Emmanuel, Simu Liu, and Ali Suliman – with the dog, making his first appearance with the group of athletes after the first 70% of this story. The dog, who the group named Arthur the King, is an abandoned stray in the city of Santo Domingo, who after hooking up with the team mid-way through the competition bonds with Mikael Lindnord and displays a level of intelligence that is unmatched by any dog I have seen portrayed in any movie. Somehow, this dog was able to follow the group of adventure racers through over 200 miles of jungle and mountains and managed to save several of their lives along the way.

Several highly emotional scenes between the dog and Mikael Lindnord are very well done, especially with an ending that is worth sitting through these 90 minutes. This is a story that is definitely for dog lovers and reminds all of us that there is so little we truly know about the intelligence of pets.

The Rotten Tomatoes rating of only 67% is once again, way off, with my rating a solid 85% recommendation.

Oscar Winners 2023


The good news is that, unlike last year when “Everything Everywhere All At Once” won for best picture, this year’s horrendous and disgusting disaster “Poor Things” did not win best picture. The bad news is that Lily Gladstone did not win Best Actress for “Killers of the Flower Moon” which would have made her the first American Indian to win an Oscar. The Academy decided to give the Best Actress award to Emma Stone for Poor Things, and a performance that I thought after seeing this horrible production, an actress would be too embarrassed to accept any award, due to the series of insane and crazy scenes Stone portrayed in this film.

I was disappointed that Paul Giamatti did not win Best Actor, however, Oppenheimer was a stronger overall movie than Giamatti’s “The Holdovers”. Cillian Murphy was excellent in the lead role of Robert Oppenheimer.

Oppenheimer won 7 Oscars, and most critics were expecting many more wins. My main problem with the movie was the non-stop background music throughout, even during many important dialogue scenes. Robert Downy Jr. won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor.

Killers of the Flower Moon was nominated for 10 Oscars and won 0. This also happened with Martin Scorsese’s 2019 movie, the Irishman. Scorsese has been nominated for 16 best director Oscars and has only won one for “The Departed”, released in 2006. There is something very wrong with the voting members concerning Scorsese.

Best picture

  • “Oppenheimer” — Winner
  • “American Fiction”
  • “Anatomy of a Fall”
  • “Barbie”
  • “The Holdovers”
  • “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • “Maestro”
  • “Past Lives”
  • “Poor Things”
  • “The Zone of Interest”

Best supporting actress

  • Da’Vine Joy Randolph, “The Holdovers” — Winner
  • Emily Blunt, “Oppenheimer”
  • Danielle Brooks, “The Color Purple”
  • America Ferrera, “Barbie”
  • Jodie Foster, “Nyad”

Best animated short film

  • “War Is Over! Inspired by the Music of John & Yoko” — Winner
  • “Letter to a Pig”
  • “Ninety-Five Senses”
  • “Our Uniform”
  • “Pachyderm”

Best animated feature film

  • “The Boy and the Heron” — Winner
  • “Elemental”
  • “Nimona”
  • “Robot Dreams”
  • “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse”

Best original screenplay

  • “Anatomy of a Fall” — Winner
  • “The Holdovers”
  • “Maestro”
  • “May December”
  • “Past Lives”

Best adapted screenplay

  • “American Fiction” — Winner
  • “Barbie”
  • “Oppenheimer”
  • “Poor Things”
  • “The Zone of Interest”

Best makeup and hairstyling

  • “Poor Things” — Winner
  • “Golda”
  • “Maestro”
  • “Oppenheimer”
  • “Society of the Snow”

Best production design

  • “Poor Things” — Winner
  • “Barbie”
  • “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • “Napoleon”
  • “Oppenheimer”

Best costume design

  • “Poor Things” — Winner
  • “Barbie”
  • “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • “Napoleon”
  • “Oppenheimer”

Best international feature film

  • “The Zone of Interest,” United Kingdom — Winner
  • “Io Capitano,” Italy
  • “Perfect Days,” Japan
  • “Society of the Snow,” Spain
  • “The Teachers’ Lounge,” Germany

Best supporting actor

  • Robert Downey Jr., “Oppenheimer” — Winner
  • Sterling K. Brown, “American Fiction”
  • Robert De Niro, “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • Ryan Gosling, “Barbie”
  • Mark Ruffalo, “Poor Things”

Best visual effects

  • “Godzilla Minus One” — Winner
  • “The Creator”
  • “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3”
  • “Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One”
  • “Napoleon”

Best film editing

  • “Oppenheimer” — Winner
  • “Anatomy of a Fall”
  • “The Holdovers”
  • “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • “Poor Things”

Best documentary short film

  • “The Last Repair Shop” — Winner
  • “The ABCs of Book Banning”
  • “The Barber of Little Rock”
  • “Island in Between”
  • “Nǎi Nai & Wài Pó”

Best documentary feature film

  • “20 Days in Mariupol” — Winner
  • “Bobi Wine: The People’s President”
  • “The Eternal Memory”
  • “Four Daughters”
  • “To Kill a Tiger”

Best Cinematography

  • “Oppenheimer” — Winner
  • “El Conde”
  • “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • “Maestro”
  • “Poor Things”

Best live-action short film

  • “The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar” — Winner
  • “The After”
  • “Invincible”
  • “Knight of Fortune”
  • “Red, White and Blue”

Best sound

  • “The Zone of Interest” — Winner
  • “The Creator”
  • “Maestro”
  • “Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One”
  • “Oppenheimer”

Best original score

  • “Oppenheimer” — Winner
  • “American Fiction”
  • “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny”
  • “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • “Poor Things”

Best original song

  • “What Was I Made For?” from “Barbie” — Winner
  • “It Never Went Away” from “American Symphony”
  • “I’m Just Ken” from “Barbie”
  • “The Fire Inside” from “Flamin’ Hot”
  • “Wahzhazhe (A Song For My People)” from “Killers of the Flower Moon”

Best actor

  • Cillian Murphy, “Oppenheimer” — Winner
  • Bradley Cooper, “Maestro”
  • Colman Domingo, “Rustin”
  • Paul Giamatti, “The Holdovers”
  • Jeffrey Wright, “American Fiction”

Best director

  • Christopher Nolan, “Oppenheimer” — Winner
  • Jonathan Glazer, “The Zone of Interest”
  • Yorgos Lanthimos, “Poor Things”
  • Martin Scorsese, “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • Justine Triet, “Anatomy of a Fall”

Best Actress

  • Emma Stone, “Poor Things” — Winner
  • Annette Bening, “Nyad”
  • Lily Gladstone, “Killers of the Flower Moon”
  • Sandra Hüller, “Anatomy of a Fall”
  • Carey Mulligan, “Maestro”

Movie Review: Dune Part 2


The sequel to the original Dune released in 2021 was a movie I streamed some time ago and it was so boring that I had to fast-forward through a majority of the film. For the sequel “Dune Part 2”, the extreme levels of boredom still exist and I thought that the best way to see both of these movies is to either get the DVDs or stream them, and then just skip to the action scenes and special effects. Dune 2 is yet another example of special effects first, great screenplay a distant second. This is mostly because of the anticipated embedded audience that the producers expect because of the fans of the Dune books and the original movie.

The other problem with this film is that nothing is really explained almost as if they expect that the entire movie-going audience has fully read the entire book series. Characters come out of nowhere, and there are few if any connections from one scene to the next. For a 2 hour and 46 minute film, this can get old very quickly and I was anxiously waiting for this entire long nightmare to end after about 30 minutes.

As for the high ratings both on IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes, I have no idea why this long, boring, and disconnected story is receiving such high marks. 190 million dollars was spent on this production, and most of this went to the special effects, which for me the is only reason to try and endure the 2+ hours. There is no real understandable or even recognizable story here, and with a better screenplay, this would have been a much better movie experience.

Dune 2 has several of the same actors as the first film, including Timothée Chalamet, Zendaya, and Josh Brolin with this sequel including new actors, Austin Butler, Javier Bardem, Dave Bautista, Florence Pugh, and Christopher Walken. After some research there is a Dune 3 in the planning stages and depending on how much money this mostly bad movie makes there might very well be a 3rd movie. Based on how boring the first two Dune films have been, I will find it difficult to sit through a 3rd one.

Regardless of the incorrect high ratings for Dune Part 2, I do not recommend this movie.