Movie Review: I Know What You Did Last Summer


Far too often, it is hard to believe the movies that are chosen by executives to remake It is often difficult to understand the films chosen by executives for remakes or, in this case, a new sequel to the original “I Know What You Did Last Summer.” (1997). At its best, the original movie was a very stupid, poorly produced slasher movie that grossed only 125 million world wide. Through some demographic calculations and surveys based on the name recognition created from the original movie, the decision was made to try and make more money from the same basic idea about young people on a dangerous road who make a series of mistakes, and a young man dies.

This sequel did not have enough imagination to create a new idea, and once again, five people in their twenties are on the same kind of road overlooking a cliff, with one drunk idiot playing a game of chicken with oncoming cars at night, and once again, someone dies in a car accident. Why not think of something new? Why not have a new evil slasher character that kills people other than, once again, the faceless man in the dark raincoat who guts people with a giant fishhook? We saw this already, 28 years ago. Why do the same thing again?

This time around, there are five new characters in their twenties, Danica Richards played by Madelyn Cline, Ava Brucks played by Chase Sui Wonders – both of whom recently dated Pete Davidson. The other 3 actors involved in the car accident at the start of this movie are mostly unknown. The “hook” idea to save the box office for this bad movie is to bring back three of the main actors of the original 1997 movie, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Freddie Prinze Jr., and a strange, misplaced dream sequence cameo from Sarah Michelle Gellar. The attempt to connect what happened in the first story with this new story failed, along with the absurd ending – an attempt to shock and surprise the audience with the unveiling of the killer. This attempt at shocking surprise turned out to be the worst part of this bad movie because it all made zero sense. The other bad part of the ending was the idiotic reappearance of people who were definitely killed in previous scenes, who for reasons unknown, are still alive despite being killed.

This time around, the critics on Rotten Tomatoes are correct with their very low 38% ratings for this bad slasher movie. I agree with this low rating and do not recommend this film. Hopefully, this is the last movie in this franchise.

Movie Review: Superman


Due to the hype and the comments on talk shows about the new movie “Superman”, I was surprised at just how bad this movie is. There is no evidence of a coherent sequential story anywhere in these two hours. The characters fly in and out of scenes, with no explanation as to who they are or what they are doing in this badly written screenplay. This is another screenplay that should have had about 5 more re-writes, but this takes too long, and costs the studio money.

In this story, Lois Lane is currently involved with Superman, so there is no mystery about who Clark Kent really is or the ongoing ridiculous “taking eyeglasses off and on” as a major disguise for a superhero. The Superman outfit is nothing new, with tights and red underwear, which, since the beginning of this superhero icon in 1938, one would think would have mutated into a less humiliating outfilt for the actor to wear after so many years.

For this latest Superman film, there are other superheroes, including: Green Lantern, played by Nathan Fillion, Mister Terrific, played by Edi Gathego, Metamorpho, played by Anthony Carrigan, Harkgirl, in a very small part played by Isabela Merced, and The Engineer, played by Maria Gabriela de Faria. Except Green Lantern and Mister Terrific, it is hard to understand why most of the other characters are in this movie, with parts this small.

This movie stars newcomer David Corenswet as Superman, who is well cast and believable as the new Superman and Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane, who is also very good in her role. Unfortunately, the love story between the two is not nearly strong enough, with one exception: an argument during an interview between the two at the beginning of this movie that I thought was well acted. Nicholas Hoult plays the evil Lex Luthor, in a role that I thought was about on a par with Gene Hackman, who played this role in the films that starred Christopher Reeve, starting in 1978.

The rest of this story is all about action scenes, fight scenes, and frequent appearances of an AI dog that jumps on people every time he appears in a scene – not funny enough to save this mostly bad movie. One unique aspect about this new Superman version is how badly and how often Superman is beaten up, which, given the many fans of this superhero and children in the audience, is yet another problem with this film.

Rotten Tomatoes has too high ratings of 82% I can only attribute to favors and payoffs, because this movie is at best 60%, only for some of the insane action scenes. I rate this new Superman movie a disappointing pass, bad enough to potentially hurt the possibility of a sequel.

Movie Review: M3GAN 2.0


The original “M3GAN” released in 2022, received a very high 93% on Rotten Tomatoes due to its imaginative new ideas about AI. The new sequel M3GAN 2.0 ratings are only 57%, which most likely ends this franchise at two movies. The reason is the same: nobody thought writing a great script was important enough, because they had fans of the previous movie, and the same idea of throwing special effects to fix a film that once again did not work.

This script, which initially started off well, quickly devolves into a chaotic and nonsensical story. This time, there is a new robot, identified as M3GAN, that appears much more human and is significantly more violent than its predecessor. This robot utilizes much of the stolen technology from the original model and is now being deployed as an assassin to eliminate political enemies. Allison Williams returns as the lead scientist, Gemma, with Violet McGraw portraying Gemma’s niece, Cady. This screenplay is another example of a disconnected makes no sense story resulting from three screenwriters writing one script. How do three screenwriters write one script? If they work separately, like they probably did for this story, the end result is once again a movie that is disjointed and makes no sense.

Most of the last third of this mostly bad movie is all about Karate action scenes and extreme violence that lead to a ridiculous climax that, once again, mostly makes no sense.

Too many promising movie franchises like this one fail for all of these same reasons. I agree with the low ratings on Rotten Tomatoes of 57% and do not recommend this film.