Movie Review: Marty Supreme


The new movie “Marty Supreme” is yet another example of the latest type of Hollywood movie that focuses on being different rather than being good. This story is loosely based on a real table tennis player Marty Reisman (1930–2012) and is not a biography about his life. The sport of table tennis is not popular in the United States but is around the world, mostly in Japan, making this unlikely movie all the more unusual. Other attempts to make this story different are that it is way too loud, too long, too haphazard and most of all too weird.

Starting with the timeline starting in 1952, the unusual cast that includes Gwyneth Paltrow as a famous actress Kay Stone, Timothée Chalamet as Marty Mauser, the insane, broke, and constantly on the run table tenis player, x-NBA star player George Gervin of all people, Kevin O’Leary as the CEO of a pen company Milton Rockwell and angry husband of Kay Stone, who sponsors table tennis tournaments in Japan. Fran Drescher plays Marty’s mother, Rebecca Mauser.

Marty also has an on-again off off-again girlfriend, Rachel Mizler, played by Odessa A’zion, and their relationship includes scrounging for money, violence, and searching for a lost dog that later involved a gunfight. How this fits into a story about an overly ambitious table tennis player is anyone’s guess, with all these extra insane scenes making this entire 2-hour and 30-minute ride more difficult to sit through.

There is a scene with Milton Rockwell and Marty Mauser towards the end of this film that once again answers the question, “as an actor, how far are you willing to humiliate yourself to be a famous movie star, or to be an actor in a movie”? I could not believe this embarrassing scene with O’Leary and Chalamet, and I cannot believe the idiotic high ratings of 95% for this insane waste of two hours.

This movie is too long, too boring, too weird, and extremely loud. I am more than tired of all these crazy movies now becoming almost commonplace, released by Hollywood every year.

My rating for this movie is 50% only for some of Chalamet’s acting, who will probably be nominated for an Academy Award, and a recommendation to “miss this mess” at all costs.

Avatar: Fire and Ice


When I see any Avatar movie, the first three: “Avatar” (2009), “Avatar: The Way of Water” (2022) and “Avatar: Fire and Ice” (2025), I think of Pixar, the company that always puts out outstanding animated movies. Some of the best: “Toy Story” (1995, 1999, 2010, 2019), “Inside Out” (2015, 2024), and “Finding Dory” (2016). Granted, these movies are not nearly as complex and costly as the Avatar movies, which use live-action capture to create the characters. The difference is that Pixar movies consistently deliver a great story and screenplay, as well as exceptional animation. The reason for a high quality story is obvious, “how can we spend so much on great technology and not take the time to create a great story, dialogue and screenplay first”?

Unfortunately, all of the Avatar movies believe that record-breaking special effects are enough; the story is always secondary. “Avatar: Fire and Ice” is very similar to the previous movie; there is no real contiguous story, and too many examples of disconnected scenes and jumping around to different reasons for another special effect or action sequence. As with all of the Avatar movies, this one is once again, way too long at 3 hours and 15 minutes. There is no reason why this movie should be this long, with so many unnecessary scenes that have nothing to do with the overall story. This film could have easily been cut down to 2 hours and 30 minutes with no reduction in quality. Nobody in charge seems to realize that movies that are too long, can potentially greatly reduce the box office. Most people do not want to sit and watch a movie for over 3 hours, with movies normally lasting only two hours.

James Cameron started working on these Avatar movies in 2006, and now almost 20 years later, after the 3rd one has been released, there are plans for two more movies, with Avatar 4 scheduled for release in 2029 and Avatar 5 scheduled for 2031. In my opinion, it makes no sense why Cameron would want to spend the majority of his career as a screenwriter and director with one movie concept, even though these movies have advanced movie-making technology more than any other films.

This movie stars the same three main starts, Sam Worthington as Jake, Zoe Saldana as Neytiri, and Sigourney Weaver as Kiri. Other known actors include Kate Winslet, Stephen Lang, Giovanni Ribisi and Edie Falco as General Ardmore. All of these actors have to be grateful for big paydays that will probably last all the way until 2031 when the last Avatar is completed.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings are a correct and low 68% with this review, being typical of the critics’ opinions: Michael Compton: “After taking a step forward with the previous film, Fire and Ash takes a giant step back — a film overstuffed with style but completely lacking any meaningful substance.” For a normal movie a 68% rating would mean failure at the box office, but like the other Avatar movies, this one will probably also gross over 2 billion dollars worldwide. My rating is 100% for the special effects and 65% for the story and a moderate recommendation.

Movie Review: The Housemaid


The new movie “The Housemaid” is about a young woman Millie Calloway, played by Sydney Sweeney, who is desperate and living in her car after being released from prison after 10 years for committing murder. Despite Millie’s education she had no other job options than trying to be a live in housemaid to a family Nina and Brandon Winchester , played by Amanda Seyfried and Brandon Sklenar and their daughter Cece.

The beginning of this story of both normal and predictable, but as the story moves forward we are surprised by one insane revelation after another and this movie does do a very good job at surprising the audience with unexpected twists and turns. Nina has a whole series of mental problems starting with Bipolar disorder and is prone to huge bouts of anger and rage, that also includes lying to and mentally torturing the new housemaid, Millie. Many of these scenes are over the top and disturbing, too many are hard to watch.

The conclusion of this story is a highly unusual 25% of the film, devoted to explaining the story and past events that lead up to Millie, Nina and Brandon living in the same house. In my experience, with films that need to explain what happened, are normally a major sign that this is a bad screenplay and bad movie. However, this time around, the 25% end of story explanations are well enough done that they do not destroy the ending of this movie. However, what was really going on during these two hours, is so convoluted and crazy that it all mostly makes little sense. The final conclusion is violent and even involves mental and physical torture, and the surprises at the end are almost impossible to see coming.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for this movie are a too high 78% with my rating, 70% and a moderate recommendation.