Movie Review: Maybe I Do


While looking at the movie poster and the title for the new film, “Maybe I Do”, I thought that this was going to be a new James L Brooks movie. Unfortunately, this movie is not a James L Brooks film, not even close.

If anyone wonders why James L. Brooks writes and directs a new movie so rarely, it is because he wants every line, every word, and every single scene to be perfect. His best films are “Terms of Endearment”, 1983, “Broadcast News”, 1987, “As Good as it Gets”, 1997, and his last two, not as well received: “Spanglish”, 2004 and “How do you Know”, 2010. My guess is that Brooks was probably discouraged about the bad reviews for How do you Know, after laboring for probably over a year. Since 2010, he has not released a new movie probably because a new screenplay requires so much work, with no guarantee of anything. Screenwriting is in fact, the world’s most challenging art form, even for one of the best screenwriters of all time, James L. Brooks.

As far as Maybe I Do, I think there is a possibility that the producers, knowing that the screenplay was weak, tried to make the movie-going public believe that this movie might be as good as, or kind of like, a James L. Brooks film. Once a movie is released and trashed by Rotten Tomatoes at a 27% rating, then they have to be creative to try and save the box office. This new unique idea will fail like so many others I have seen with other bad movies that have been rated low by Rotten Tomatoes as soon as they are released. Bad dialogue and story are not something you can save using tricks.

The most surprising about this essentially bad movie is the cast is a list of top actors who have been around a long time agreeing to make it. Including Diane Keaton, Richard Gere, William H. Macy, Susan Sarandon and Emma Roberts. Critic Rex Reed captures the reason why actors like these took roles in this film perfectly: “Maybe I Do is another sad example of what happens to seasoned pros when they hang around long enough to end up in material that is regrettably beneath them. They want to work to keep flagging careers alive, but with worthy vehicles, so few and far between, they’re forced to accept whatever lean projects come their way.” Everything about this comment is accurate and the reason why all 4 of these well-known actors, read the script and still agreed to make this film. This kind of thing happens way too often for so many named actors who just want to stay relevant in Hollywood at the risk of making too many bad films.

Fundamentally the problem is that it seems that the screenwriter, Michael Jacobs is trying too hard to make it seem that “this is the way real people talk”. Within minutes of watching this film, I realized that nobody talks like these people. Nobody would ever want to talk like these characters and if anyone talked like them, nobody could stand to be around them. There were times when it was impossible to understand the point they were trying to make, even though there were some ideas about the pain of love, loss, and trying to find love that was well stated. There are some who will find some of this dialogue too preachy, but I thought that some of these moments and on-point comments about one of the most painful parts of being alive, were the only good things about this movie. There was an attempt at a farcical ending – that includes the parents of a young couple trying to decide if they should get married during a group dinner, and their parents who by coincidence already know each other. Most of this fails as do most of the jokes, with the exception of some of the comments from William H Macy.

Perhaps with about 5 more rewrites and collaboration from the best writer of movies like this, James L. Brooks, this screenplay could have been saved, but unfortunately, this one will be in and out of theaters in about 2 weeks. This time around the critical ratings of 27% from Rotten Tomatoes is correct.

Netflix Movie Review: You People


The new Netflix movie “You People” has a positive aspect – in trying to address the awkward guilt that white people sometimes have with black people and the awkward resentment that some black people have toward white people. Most of this awkwardness is made humorous – and some of this works, some of this does not work. The main negative aspect of this screenplay, co-wrote by Jonah Hill is that the relationship between Jewish and overweight Jonah Hill, who plays Ezra, and Lauren London who plays Amira is not at all believable.

This story is kind of like an attempted comedic version of “Guess Who is Coming to Dinner”, released in 1967, starring Sydney Potier, Spenser Tracy, and Katherine Hepburn. It is not fair to compare these two movies, mainly because the eras between 55 years ago and now are so different, but the main reason is that Guess Who is Coming to Dinner is a drama and You People is a comedy.

The other flaw here is that Eddie Murphy is in this movie and is never really funny. Murphy comes off as both bored and bland throughout his entire role. This is a big problem when your main comedic well-known star is never funny. Murphy plays Amira’s father Akbar, and along with Ezra’s mother Shelly, played by Julia Louis-Dreyfus – they create the main obstacles in the dating and marriage of Ezra and Amira. Through rude comments by both of them, and in the case of Shelly, her trying too hard to understand and appreciate black people, comes off as bigoted rather than supportive. Some of this is funny, but too much of this can be just awkward, and too awkward is never funny.

The acting in this light comedy is mostly good and includes David Duchovny, who pulls off the most awkward scene where he tries to sing at a piano – even though his singing is extremely off-key. Duchovny seems very out of place in this role. Nia Long plays Fatima, Amira’s mother, and also seems like she is barely in this movie mostly sleepwalking through her role.

Despite the flaws, this movie has enough positive aspects including message, and funny moments to give it a passable review and a mild recommendation. The Rotten Tomatoes rating of only 45 is once again, dead wrong.

Netflix Movie Review: All Quiet on the Western Front


As I have said several times on this blog, starting with the most significant war movie ever produced, “Saving Private Ryan”, released in July 1998. When you make a war movie, you have an obligation as the producer and director to make the war scenes as horrific as possible. If you do not show war the way it really is, then you disrespect the millions who have fought and died in all Wars. If someone thinks that the violence and horror in this or any other war movie are too much, then they simply should not see the film. War is war, it should not exist in the world, but it does, and showing what it was really like is mandatory for all war movies.

The new Netflix movie “All Quiet on the Western Front” is about World War I. In terms of horrendous death during the battles in this war that started in 1914, World War I is one of the worst, mainly because of the use of chemical warfare. The depiction of the mud, rain, horrendous conditions, huge trenches, and non-stop death were shot as well as any war movie I have ever seen. There was one scene where they showed a dead body high in the air at the top of a tree, because the soldier was blown up and thrown into the air. One can only imagine being a young man of only 20 years old, born at the exact wrong time in history. Too poor to avoid living through unimaginable daily death, wondering if the next minute it was your turn to die. Scenes like these are commonplace in all wars.

All Quiet on the Western Front was also released in 1930 and 1979, starring actor Richard Thomas. This time around, this Netflix version has been correctly nominated for 9 Academy awards, including best picture. There are no named actors in this movie, but all of the acting starting with Felix Kammerer as Paul Bäumer is outstanding throughout these 2 hours. The Rotten Tomatoes rating for this film is correct and very high 92%. I agree with his rating and give this movie my highest recommendation.