Movie Review: We Live in Time


The new movie “We Live in Time” can be seen as a tearjerker from a mile away. Like almost all movie tearjerkers, the story once again involves Cancer – in this case, stage 3 Ovarian Cancer. The difference with this film is how the story is told, through a series of “revolving flashbacks” in one of the most unusual ways I have ever seen a story unfold.

We Live in Time stars Andrew Garfield as Tobias and Florence Pugh as Almut, a married couple dealing with trying to have a child and Almut’s diagnosis of Cancer. They meet after Almut accidentally hits Tobias with her car while he is retrieving a pen so he can sign his divorce papers, definitely a new idea where two people meet for the first time. This story also includes Almut and Tobias’ attempts to conceive a child, which include trying IVF and their arguments that include Tobias wanting a child and Almut’s doubts that she ever wants to be a parent. The decision about Almut’s treatment is made by the couple early on to choose to live with quality rather than quantity to prolong Almut’s life despite her terminal Cancer diagnosis and months of chemotherapy treatment.

The secondary story involves Almut, who is a professional Chef, entering a Chef competition with her work partner which seemed to have more to do with making this film lasting a full two hours than any other reason.

The world is sick of hearing about Cancer, the scourge of humanity for many decades, and the only solutions being chemo therapy and removing body parts. Considering the money generated from Cancer treatment in the world, the odds are high that the medical profession does not want to cure cancer, for fear of losing trillions of dollars of revenue. This movie is another tear-jerker, but it was produced well enough to recommend.

I mostly agree with the 79% ratings for this film on Rotten Tomatoes and do recommend this movie due to the well told story and solid acting performances from Garfield and Pugh.

Movie Review: Smile 2


Someone who is a fan of horror movies and wrote the screenplays for “Smile” and the sequel “Smile 2” decided that a person who just stares at you with an evil grin is horrifying. The problem is that a person standing with a strange wide grin gets old after a certain number of similar scenes. Smile 2 is the sequel to the movie Smile, released in 2022 about an evil spirit floating around the world who invects a victim, over time forcing them to kill themselves in front of a witness. Then once the person is dead, the spirit infects the witness creating a chain of people who are killed.

This time around the main character is a Taylor Swift-like famous singer who is the newest part of the chain of victims of the evil spirit who infects a person’s body. Naomi Scott plays a famous singer Skye Riley with the most memorable part of her performance – her constant high-pitched screaming throughout these 2 hours. This is another part of this sequel that gets old after the third or fourth loud scream.

There are several disturbing scenes of smile victims killing themselves, by either trying to cut off their face or in one instance, a man taking a large weight plate and repeatedly smashing it into his own face. At times it is hard to believe that movies like this are considered horror entertainment because this level of over-the-top gore is never necessary to scare any audience.

The ending, which comes out of nowhere is another insane bloody ending that even includes a giant bloody alien that comes out of the body of Skye Riley. At this point. I had more than enough already and could not wait for this film to come to an end.

The film critic Sean Collier summarizes the problems with this film the best: “Our movie would lose all of its terror by turning the lights on and avoiding staccato bursts of unmotivated sound design, it’s not scary — it’s just irritating“.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for Smile 2 are way too high 83% with my rating at 50% and a big thumbs down. Lets all hope that this is the last Smile movie – but there will probably be a Smile 3 in another 2 years, unfortunately.

Movie Review: Goodrich


There is a well-known screenwriting paradigm known as the Three-Act Structure, which states that a screenplay has three acts. The first act sets up the characters and the main part of the story. The second act creates a major conflict peak, which is resolved in the third and final act.

The new movie “Goodrich” starring Michael Keaton is one of the few films I have seen that violates this well-known screenwriting paradigm. The main character Andy Goodrich, played by Keaton, who owns an art gallery, wakes up to find out that his wife is in rehab and wants a divorce. The remainder of this story is about a long series of bad luck events, and problems with Andy’s 2 children including his daughter Grace with his previous wife, played by Mila Kunis. Then the Goodrich art gallery is failing and about to go bankrupt.

This major departure from what most would expect from a story like this is ultimately what is best about this movie. This story is about real life, not a movie where there might be a happy ending. This is not about the nice person who has been getting the worst of things and who finally triumphs over major obstacles. We want movies to work the happy way because the conflict resolution and the nice guy winning in the end is why so many millions of people go to the movies in the first place. All of us also know that this is not how real life works. Just because someone is nice and deserving does not mean things will ultimately work out for them. Life is a long series of conflicts and attempted resolutions with no guarantees of success. This one unique drama/comedy movie does a great job of showing a real-life story, not a generic Hollywood happy ending. This one fact and the excellent acting and story make this film a standout.

Other actors in this film are all very good in their roles, including Kevin Pollak who works in the art gallery, Andie MacDowell as Goodrich’s x-wife and Carmen Ejogo who plays the daughter of a famous late artist who betrays Andy. Hallie Meyers-Shyer, wrote and directed this film and produced a real-life, believable story.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for Goodrich are way too low 68% with my rating a 85% rating and a solid recommendation.