Movie Review: I. S. S.


The new movie “I. S. S.” is about an outstanding story idea about what would the Russian and American astronauts do if while they were circling the earth in the International Space Station, a major nuclear war broke out between the United States and Russia. What would happen, how would the Russian and American astronauts react if they were ordered to take over the space station, including killing all on board from the other country? Unfortunately, this is one of those films that took a great idea, iand turned it nto a ridiculous movie, because the screenplay is so bad. After the nuclear war began and it was obvious that the planet Earth was almost completely covered by fire, nothing but irrational and idiotic events occurred, starting with the Russian woman scientist going insane, even to the point of trying to blow up the space station. Why would anyone do this, was never explained, and given the circumstances made absolutely no sense.

What follows are some hand-to-hand fights, some for completely unexplained explained reasons. While sitting through this almost 2-hour movie, I was amazed at how bad the story was, including the motivations of 6 astronauts under the most extreme circumstances. This movie represents a huge “opportunity lost” for a screenplay, that should have brought the message that in the event of any nuclear war, nobody wins. With nuclear war, everybody dies either immediately or over time, due to radiation and nuclear winter. Six human beings on opposite sides on a space station circling the Earth during a huge nuclear war are a microcosm of the obvious fundamental concept – “how can there be a winner if everybody is dead?”. The other obvious storyline missed in this film is that in the event of nuclear war, everybody on the space station also dies because there is no world to ever return to once the war is over. This is a film that probably could have been rescued because of the great idea, and all it would have taken would have been about 5 more rewrites of the screenplay. Under circumstances like this, we all want to believe that intelligence will always win over insanity.

The cast of I.S.S. includes Ariana DeBose as Dr. Kira Foster, one of the 3 American astronauts and the only well-known actor in this cast.

The Rotten Tomatoes rating of a low 62% are this time around, correct. I agree with this rating and rate this film a solid pass, due to the stupid story direction that ruined a great idea for a new movie about space travel.

Movie Review: Mean Girls


For the second time in recent weeks, another popular-well-remembered-cult movie has been produced, this time “Mean Girls”, first released in 2004. The hook once again is to remake the original as a musical to generate more interest. This is also the case with the recent remake of “The Color Purple” with both new movies starting as musicals on Broadway.

In every case, the idea behind remaking a well-known film is name recognition, and remaking the original as a musical is intended to bring in additional people because they are curious about the musical numbers. This idea might fail and succeed because there are a great many people who hate musicals but love the original film, and people who love musicals but hate the original Mean Girls. This movie, just like The Color Purple was very close to showing too many musical numbers, and unfortunately a high number of the musical numbers were not only not that good, but seemed unnecessary.

The reason why the Mean Girls movie from 2004 was so popular is that we all can relate to the cruel insanity of bullying that comes far too often with childhood. The lead bully Reginal George is about as cruel and vicious as they come. What is it about individuals like this, who derive so much sadistic pleasure from trashing and humiliating other human beings? Very often it is young girls who are far more cruel than young boys in middle school and high school. Bullying is a major problem around the world with too many young children committing suicide as a result.

There are several famous lines and scenes from the original movie that are repeated in this remake with three original cast members Tina Fey and Tim Meadows reprising their roles and Lindsay Lohan appearing at the end as a math contest moderator. What is the point of showing so many scenes from the original movie? Why not have a whole new series of new scenes and ideas, much funnier than the original? Then not worrying about disappointing the rabid fans of the 2004 version, who just want to see mostly the same movie again? Adding some musical numbers will never change a bad idea into a good one, regardless of any Broadway musical.

The new cast members, despite the musical numbers, were not as funny or effective as the original cast, including Angourie Rice as Cady Heron, Reneé Rapp as Regina George, and Avantika as Karen Shetty. While this entire new cast is not bad, they are also not different or funny enough to warrant any sense that this new version was worthy of the first film. I was surprised that after 20 years including a Broadway musical and so many script updates and rewrites this movie was at best, not funny enough, different enough, and only average. For all fans of the original Mean Girls, released in 2004, see that movie, because this new one is just not worth 2 hours of your time.

The Rotten Tomatoes rating for this film is a low 71%. I agree with this rating and do not recommend this movie.

Movie Review: Memory


It is important for any moviegoer going into the new movie “Memory” to know that this is a film with no real screenplay, connected scenes, signs of acting, or any real story. Memory is just a series of disconnected vignettes about a woman Sylvia, played by Jessica Chastain, who is a recovering alcoholic, and a man Saul played by Peter Sarsgaard who is suffering from early onstage dementia. Saul and Sylvia are not married, they are acquaintances, who meet in one of the strangest scenes I have ever seen where Saul follows Sylvia around the city of New York and winds up on her doorstep the next morning. Over time, they become involved and as things progress, the extent of Saul’s dementia becomes more pronounced.

There are numerous side stories, including Sylvia’s memories of a bad childhood, where she was sexually abused by her father and her mother refuses to believe any of her stories. Sylvia has a daughter from a previous relationship and her purpose seems to make this movie have a runtime closer to 2 hours. Saul has a controlling brother who tries to prevent him from trying to live a normal life, due to this dementia. This entire movie seems more like a documentary that follows the lives of about 7 different people – to their houses, picnics, dinner at restaurants, arguments, and several nude scenes where in one instance, Saul is found lying nude and unconscious on the bathroom floor and is discovered by Sylvia.

There is no story resolution here, no message, and in the end, a very abrupt ending with Sylvia vacuuming the floor and then hugging Saul. What is the point of all this? To once again be different just for the sake of being different? I am more than tired of movies like this, that cut corners in an attempt to try and discover a new type of movie, that is not a movie at all. Then add the high number of minutes where this entire film is extremely slow and boring.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for this movie is a high 86% but with a low 71% fan rating on IMDB. My rating is 60% and a solid pass on this one, hoping that movies like this one are all a passing fad.