Movie Review: Maestro


The new movie “Maestro” is one of those end-of-year movies that you know as soon as the film starts will have a great chance to win the best picture Oscar. For this movie, the quality of the cinematography and especially the amazing makeup making actor Bradley Cooper look exactly like the subject of this good biography – Leonard Bernstein are both huge standouts. The first half of this movie is in black and white and looks a great deal like movies that were made in the 1930s and 40s. The second half of this film is in color, and this reminded me of the famous movie “The Wizard of Oz”, which was released in 1939, that also started out in black and white and finished in color.

The acting is also outstanding throughout, including Bradley Cooper who both co-wrote and directed this movie as well as starring Leonard Bernstein and Carey Mulligan who plays Bernstein’s long-suffering wife Felicia Montealegre. Throughout the relationship between Montealegre and Bernstein, Bernstein was constantly cheating on her with numerous other men. Over a long period and so many affairs, this story does a good job of showing how much all of this cheating was affecting Felicia. Standup comedian Sarah Silverman has a short but very good cameo as Bernstein’s sister Shirley Bernstein.

The only problem with this film is that there is really no sequential story, just a series of scenes, some connected but most not connected. This lack of a sequential story might have been by design, along with the black and white then color idea, but for any film to hit a home run, there always must be a contiguous story. Otherwise, for some important reasons, the story becomes more of a documentary than a movie biography of Leonard Bernstein. I also thought there should have been many more scenes of Bernstein’s musical genius and conducting and less of the soap opera aspects of Bernstein’s life.

I agree with the only good rating of 81% on Rotten Tomatoes, mainly due to the screenplay and the lack of a sequential story that ultimately might prevent this film from winning the Best Picture Oscar. I do recommend this movie, mainly for the outstanding acting and the great makeup work on Bradley Cooper, which has to be a 100% guarantee for an Oscar.

Netflix Movie Review: Leave the World Behind


The new Netflix movie “Leave the World Behind” has several very impressive visual effects. At the start, there is a huge oil tanker slowly running aground while many people on the beach watch. This looked like they really commissioned a huge tanker and ran it into a beach for real – not computer-generated effects. There is another scene where there is a log jam of driverless Tesla cars all crashing into each other on a highway, due to some kind of ongoing electrical attack from a source that was never fully defined in this story. There is a scene where many deer outside of a log cabin seem to be insane. They are standing in front of a young woman who looks like she is in a trance, and does not move. This is one scene that did look like it was computer generated. This is one of those films where all of the loose ends are never fully resolved and I have never been a fan of a movie like this.

Leave the World Behind stars Julia Roberts as Amanda Sandford and Ethan Hawke as Clay Sandford who are a husband and wife with two children who decide to rent a house for a week. Very shortly after moving in, several strange things start happening, starting with electrical problems in the house, a big New York City blackout and then news of commercial airplanes dropping out of the sky. Very soon after moving in the owner of the house G. H. Scott played by Mahershala Ali and his daughter Ruth, played by Myha’la show up and want to move back into their house because of a blackout in New York City. Understandable conflicts arise from their request to move into the house, mostly between Amanda and G.H.’s very hostile daughter Ruth. Ruth’s rude hostility I thought was way too much considering the extreme circumstances.

Later in the story, Rose, the daughter of Amanda and Clay runs off and cannot be found. Considering the insane circumstances of imminent worldwide doom, this 10 year old girl running off on her own makes very little sense – as does the ending that involves this 10 year old girl and the final episode of the TV series “Friends”. The problem with this movie is that there are way too many loose ends that ruin what started out as an interesting idea for an end of the world story.

I do not understand why the Rotten Tomatoes ratings for this movie are as high as 75%, with my rating about 65% and a pass on this movie – mainly because of the weirdness throughout.

Movie Review: Eileen


Eileen Dunlop, played by Thomasin McKenzie is a 20-something woman who lives in Massachusetts in the 1960s and represents millions of poor and lower middle-class people who because of their parents and where they were born, have minimal options for a happy life. Some people can break free from a life like this, but most are never able to achieve anything better than the cards they were dealt at birth.

The main character of the new movie “Eileen” lives on a depressing rundown street, somewhere in Massachusetts with her father who is a major drunk and her mother who has recently died. Eileen is a secretary and errand runner at a local prison for boys and for good reasons, hates her father. From the beginning, everything about this film is dark and depressing almost as if every scene was shot at night or while it was raining. The first third of this movie is all about Eileen’s depressing life with her retired police officer father and her job, making sitting through the first 30 minutes rather tedious.

There is a term in movie making known as a “fantasy sequence”. This movie has no less than 2 sick fantasy sequences, that are inserted for reasons that could only be to shock the audience. After Eileen is told by the police to hide her father’s gun, there is a sudden, unnecessary, and horrific scene, where she takes the gun, puts it under her chin, and then fires. There is nothing before this horrible scene that could ever be considered a logical set-up. There is another scene where Eileen takes the same gun and stands behind her father and shoots him in the back of the head. Why are these scenes in this movie, other than to perhaps wake up the audience, who by now is sound asleep?

A new story begins with the arrival of a Ph.D. from Harvard, Rebecca played by Anne Hathaway who soon befriends Eileen, and soon after it looks like this friendship could be turning into more.

At the 75% point of this movie, which has at best turned out to be a very boring experience, everything turns into a different, disgusting, and insane new direction when Rebecca calls Eileen to her house for some drinks. For me, this crazy climax, which includes scenes with the mother of one of the boys in the person who was accused of murder is where the entire story falls apart – wrecking any chance of a recommendation, despite the good acting.

Very recently Ann Hathaway appeared on the Jimmy Fallon show to plug Eileen and when it was time for her to talk about this film, all they talked about was one scene where her character makes this primal scream while having drinks with Eileen. There is no mention of the story or any part of this film other than having the Tonight Show audience trying to primal scream like Hathaway in this movie. I thought this was a telltale sign showing how bad and strange this movie is and how it ended. This now makes two low budget art movies that Hathway has appeared in recently, the last one “She Came to Me”, is also extremely strange with a bad story. Its one thing to want to appear in many different types of movies to challenge your skills as an actor, its another thing to actually read the script first.

The insane high ratings on Rotten Tomatoes of 85% make zero sense, because this film has no plausible third act and is too crazy to even be called a movie. My rating is 40% only for some of the acting and a solid pass for this one.