Movie Review: The Devil Wears Prada 2


The last time there was a major social media interest fervor for creating a sequel to a production that had been off the air for years is the outstanding TV series “Suits,” which ran for nine years from 2011 to 2019. This resulted in a TV sequel on NBC, “LA Suits,” which was a disaster of 13 episodes that ran for one season in 2025 and was immediately cancelled for low ratings and bad episodes. The problem with racing into a new production based on buzz on social media are that very often the new show is rushed, to take advantage of what could be a temporary anomaly of enthusiasm, mostly to cash in on ratings and box office. Unfortunately, when a new production is rushed because of social media buzz and is based on a previous show that was outstanding, what results is a bad TV show or movie. The bottom line is that you cannot rush quality. Creating a new great idea or writing a great screenplay can take years.

“The Devil Wears Prada”, released in 2006, has maintained its popularity on Cable TV for twenty years. This is one of those movies that, even though you have seen it many times, you still want to watch it again. The quality and great moments in this original film are relatable to everybody who has ever worked for a company and/or with very difficult people. This includes the incredible rudeness of CEO of the magazine “Runway”, Miranda Priestly, (Meryl Streep), and the ongoing nastiness of Andy’s coworker Emily (Emily Blunt).

Miranda’s inconsiderate behavior towards Andy (Anne Hathaway) included not even remembering her name, throwing her coat on Andy’s desk, mean, condescending comments, ignoring, and dismissing at a level at times that are so extreme they are funny. Far too many of us have been subjected to this kind of employment garbage daily, only because someone else has us under their financial thumb. This harsh reality of making a living is one of the most unfortunate parts about being alive and needing money to buy food and shelter.

The sequel, “The Devil Wears Prada 2” is a far better effort than Suits LA. The screenplay was written by Aline Brosh McKenna and Lauren Weisberger, walked the line of giving the audience reminders of some of the best moments of the original, with enough new ideas that make this movie experience not seem exploitive. The bottom line in any new movie production like this, is to make money first. Taking huge risks is far too often not an option because the producers do not want to alienate the fans of the original movie. Therefore, frequent reminders of the original are to be expected.

The other main character returning for this sequel is Stanley Tucci, who is outstanding as Nigel, with Lucy Liu as a famous fashion mogul whom Miranda wants to interview to save Runway because the magazine is going through hard times due to the greatly reduced interest in print media, due to publishing on the internet. I also thought that the twist at the end of this story, about wealthy businessmen screwing over other wealthy people, was too similar to the ending of the original film. Lady Gaga also has a cameo towards the end of this movie along with Donatella Versace, Naomi Campbell and Heidi Klum.

Overall, I thought this sequel was good, but nearly as great as the original, with the acting good throughout. I agree with the 79% ratings on Rotten Tomatoes and give this movie a moderate recommendation.

Movie Review: She Came to Me


Somewhere in New York City, probably over a year ago, there was a dinner party with actor Daniel Day-Lewis, his wife, writer director Rebecca Miller and several other actors including Anne Hathaway, Marisa Tomei and Peter Dinklage. During this dinner, a favor-bank was created that included possible movie deals and future collaboration. Unfortunately, one of the deals was an agreement to make the new movie “She Came to Me”, where even the title of this strange production makes little or no sense.

This entire story seems to be entirely about being as extremely different as possible, never interesting or good. This all starts with the two main characters Steven Lauddem, played by Peter Dinklage who is a writer of Opera and Patricia Jessup-Lauddem, played by Anne Hathaway who is a therapist. From the start of this movie, we are expected to believe that Anne Hathaway is married to Peter Dinklage, which in the real world is highly unlikely. It turns out that Steven has been creatively blocked for 5 years, unable to turn out another Opera and his frustrations are having a negative effect on the marriage. This leads to a meeting between a drunk Steven and Katrina Trento, played by Marisa Tomei at a bar, who is of all things a tug boat captain. Within 30 minutes we realize the problem with this film, trying so hard to be different, weird and strange, forgetting any attempt just to be good. A tug boat captain? Really?

Then Katrina and Steven have a one-night stand, later finding out that Katrina is a love and sex addict. A sex-addicted tub boat captain – easily a character we have never seen in any movie before. Who is now obsessed with Peter Dinklage? Soon after Steven breaks free of his creative block by falling by falling off of a pier and while under water is suddenly struck with a new idea for an Opera. Another implausible scene.

There is a subplot with Steven and Patricia’s son Julian and the daughter of their maid that later becomes the main plot with a final series of scenes that are an attempt for them to get married for Julian to avoid a possible statutory rape charge. It turns out that the husband of the maid is a court stenographer and also a Civil War reenactor – covering all the bases as far as professions within this story. Convoluted and insane, as the characters and plot are all over the place forcing different ideas and nonsensical situations, forgetting about quality or respecting the audience.

There is a scene with Patricia going crazy during a session with one of her patients and starts taking off all her clothes while screaming – that is one of the most insane out-of-place crazy scenes I have seen in any movie, much less one that is supposed to be a thrown-together romantic comedy. It was hard to believe that Anne Hathaway agreed to shoot this scene, considering it was bad enough she was in this film in the first place.

It makes no sense that any screenplay in this stage of a creative writing process was greenlighted before about 5 more re-writes, much less 3 named actors agreeing to make this movie, that was nowhere near ready to start shooting. This film reminded me in some ways of the movie “Maybe I Do” that was released in February of this year and included several well known actors who once again agreed to make a movie before reading the script first.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for this film are a correct and very low 46% that could be even lower at 25%. This movie is a very surprising big miss, especially considering the named actors involved.

Movie Review: Armageddon Time


Very often the best films are about the simplest of stories. This is true of the new movie “Armageddon Time”, which is about an 11-year-old Jewish Boy in 1980, who is having trouble in school and is best friends with a trouble-making black boy in his class. Their teacher is rude, especially to the black boy Johnny, played by Jaylin Webb and the main character of this story Paul, played by Banks Repeta – one of the most unusual names I have ever seen. They are caught smoking weed in the bathroom and run off on their own during a class trip to the Guggenheim museum, but for some unexplained reason, they never get into trouble after they take the subway home and were missing from the group. I consider this a glaring hole in the screenplay, surprising in the middle of this mostly strong story. Paul is constantly bullied by his brother, which is hard to watch at times. Paul’s mother Esther, played by Anne Hathaway and her husband Irving played by Jeremy Strong are good in their roles but their characters seem overwhelmed by all that is going on and living with Esther’s father Aaron, played by the great Anthony Hopkins. There is also a very small part in this film where Jessica Chastain is playing someone naked Maryanne Trump who gives a school speech. There is some suggestion that she could be part of the Trump family.

Overall this story is relatively lightweight, with nothing that significant happening, other than some scenes of childhood bigotry and the plight of Johnny, who is a young black boy with dreams of being an astronaut and slowly realizing that because he is black his options in life are limited compared to the white students around him. For me, the likability of Paul, played by Banks Repeta steals this movie and is the main reason for the positive reviews.

This movie has a strong cast and good acting and despite the small story, I do recommend this film for its simplicity and many lessons about the difficulty of childhood.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings are a middle of the road 75% and I mostly agree with this rating.