Independent Film Review: Void


This movie review website started in October 2014 and over the years has been more about the writing and less about an online business venture – the reality of trying to make a new online business. Since this all began there are about 925 posts, mostly about current movies that have been released, the rest are about past movies and some posts about current events, tributes and some movie award listings. This has been a long mostly enjoyable trek, all part of a long term dream of being a screenwriter. I have written 5 screenplays myself so far – three of which I am very proud of.

Some years ago, I was ranked in the top 60 on a website called Feedspot, for the best movie review sites on the internet.  Due to my selection and rank on Feedspot, I have been asked a total of 3 times in the last few years, to review movies produced and directed by small independent filmmakers. Now finally with the 3rd request, I am proud and flattered to review a new movie called “Void” from Director/Producer/Actor/DP/Editor/Co-Writer Vaibhav Gattani – produced by his production company – Icecape films

The movie Void is unlike any film have ever seen before, with a topic that I cannot remember addressed in any film I have ever seen.

Infertility is a problem that millions of couples around the world face every day, including the many complex difficult decisions and expensive alternatives that follow this very challenging life problem.

For the story of Void, the woman becomes so desperate to have a baby, that she will do anything, including even hiring a psychoanalyst, hypnosis, and eventually even supernatural alternatives. One thing I did notice is that these insane alternatives were approached it seemed – even before the more mainstream ones were addressed first. However, this is only a less-than two-hour movie.  There is only so much time to tell a great story.

What follows are some scenes of strange events, including the use of a voodoo doll, the couple understandably arguing about what to do about their infertility and in the end a very unexpected and dramatic ending, that was extremely well done.

I thought the acting was very well done here, as well as the overall production. I give a strong recommendation to Void and hope – for the benefit of the great director that it is a great breakthrough into the extremely difficult field of filmmaking.

Void can now be seen on Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/ondemand/void

Instagram – Icescape Films

Instagram – Vaibhav Gattani

Twitter – Icescape Films

LinkedIn – Vaibhav Gattani

Facebook – Vaibhav Gattani

Facebook – Icescape Films page

Movie Review: Memory


The movie career/trend with Liam Neeson continues. Momentum from the strength of the extremely good movie Taken, released in 2008, Neeson has made around 50 movies since then, and none of them come even close to the quality of Taken. One way of looking at this is that so many movies since Taken that are average or below average makes everyone appreciate how good Taken was 14 years ago. Another way of looking at this is, why is Neeson making so many average and bad movies? He has probably made more movies by far, than any other actor in Hollywood. Is it better to wait and then make a high quality production or risk damaging your career by making so many movies that are lower quality?

After seeing “Memory” – about a hit man with Alzheimer’s involved with a complicated series of hit man contracts – I was wondering how anyone who read this script would understand it, much less greenlight it. So why was this movie made? In this blog I have cited many times my theories of Hollywood deals, paybacks, favors and deals with friends. Quite simply this muddled and bad script should never have been made into a movie, because it is far from good enough. Unfortunately it seems that Neeson is involved in some kind of movie assembly line, where he just continues to act in bad productions (with 4 more in the pipeline) with total disregard to quality. Quantity over quality is never a good idea, within any industry.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for Memory is a very low 30% and unfortunately I agree with this very low number and cannot recommend this mostly bad film.

Movie Review: The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent


In the history of Hollywood, there has probably never been a more unusual acting career than that of Nicholas Cage. On the top of the world, with a best acting Oscar in 1995 for “Leaving Las Vegas”, to some high profile and money making action movies, to some very bad real estate investments over several years, leaving him bankrupt and an acting career that was over, except for some very bad B movies that went straight to DVD. Then add 4 bad marriages, including even Lisa Marie Presley and Cage is now married for a 5th time as of February 2021.

The new movie with a strange title “The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent” is the first time since 2009 and the release of “Knowing” that a Nicolas Cage movie has actually been released to theaters and not to DVD. Since 2009, Cage has made no less than an incredible 45 DVD movies that have never been released to theaters.

Ironically this film stars Nicolas Cage as himself along with the realities of his acting career and his huge financial debt, and his entire acting career dependent on the ever changing opinions of producers and directors that he has to sometimes beg to get an acting part. At one point in the early stages of this story, Cage actually tells his agent that he has decided to “quit acting”. Considering how bad things have been going for him for so long, is an easy decision to believe. The problem with acting in Hollywood is that even if you were at the top, it never means that you will stay there, and all it takes are a few huge financial bombs for other people in charge to consider you a losing proposition. If that happens, coming back can be almost impossible. Another example of this is Bruce Willis, who has been making bad B movies for almost as long as Cage.

With Nicolas Cage, he had to continue to make movies, to continue to pay off his debts caused by over spending and overleveraging himself into buying too many houses that eventually left him bankrupt. The brilliance of this film is that it shows for the first time, what it can be like to be someone like Nicolas Cage, coming to accept that his career in acting might never be close to what it was. We all like to see a success story from someone who has fallen and hopefully this new movie will mark a new beginning for Cage. However like Mickie Rourke proved in 2008 with “The Wrestler”, just because you make a comeback does not mean that your new success will last.

As far as this movie being funny, it is at certain points, but never laugh out loud funny. The premise is somewhat funny. “Cage is invited to visit the Island compound of a known Weapons dealer who is a huge fan, and before he knows it it is forced to work with the CIA as an informant”. What works here is the growing friendship between Cage and the Weapons dealer, played by Pedro Pascal and some of the scenes between Cage and the CIA agent played by Tiffany Haddish (who also has an incredible hardship story herself, before making it in Hollywood). This movie can be slow in certain areas, but there are enough interesting points that connect and ultimately keep your attention throughout the whole two hours.

The Rotten Tomatoes ratings for this movie are a too high 89%, with my rating around 80% and a solid recommendation with the hope that Nicolas Cage has in fact made a major comeback.